MegaSteve
Tour Winner
I didn't know James Braid drove a car.
What, no love for Andy or Sir Monty...
I didn't know James Braid drove a car.
I'm not a doctor but I worry about the impact on Nadal's knees. If you watch him play he really pounds them and I don't see how long term he can not be in real trouble. I'm amazed he came back from his last lay off.
Federer is just so light on his feet in comparison, he would not mark sand if he walked on it
Re Goat I guess we have to give it to Fed for now BUT Nadal is only 3 grand slams behind whilst 5 years younger and on head to heads Nadal is way better, leading 23-15 including 9-3 in majors. Very easy to make a case for Nadal but the luvvies just cant see past poster boy Fed.
I can end this right here, right now.
His name was Max Woosnam ................................. the end!
He was an Olympic gold and silver medallist (at tennis), Davis Cup captain, Wimbledon champion; captain of Manchester City, captain of England's amateur football side and (still as an amateur) of the professional XI as well, played for Corinthians in Brazil; he scored a century at Lord's against the MCC, played golf off scratch and (almost incidentally) was a fiendish table-tennis player and, in retirement, became an expert snooker player, scoring a 147 maximum break.
Oh, he was a heavy smoker his whole life!
I think that top trumps everyone else.
But to put that in context, the football and cricket part of it was as part of a team sport so that can be dismissed. Golf is elitist, table tennis isn't a proper sport and snooker is a pub game so that doesn't count either. And what you're left with is an Olympic Gold medal at tennis (which Murray can match), an Olympic silver medal at tennis (not actually a winner but first loser so that doesn't count), Davis Cup captain (did he win it single handedly as Murray did?) and Wimbledon Champion (Murray has got that twice?). So therefore Murray is better.
Sorry, just catching up the last 4 pages and picked this as one example of many posts about 'elitism' in tennis. I'm very surprised to hear that is many people's views. Back in primary school a tennis coaching academy came into the school and asked if anyone wanted to sign up to tennis. I did so. We used to have a tennis lesson after school in the week, and then later I went to coaching sessions on the weekend, which I'm sure I remember only being about 6 quid for an hour's group coaching. I did this all the way through my teens until I got a bit older and gave it up for other pursuits. Don't understand the elitism comments at all.You can play tennis on dodgy school courts or municipal courts but to play it properly you have to join a club in this country. At that point it becomes as elitist as golf, perhaps more so as, sticking my neck out here, my perception is that there are far more golf clubs out there than tennis clubs.
Sorry, just catching up the last 4 pages and picked this as one example of many posts about 'elitism' in tennis. I'm very surprised to hear that is many people's views. Back in secondary school a tennis coaching academy came into the school and asked if anyone wanted to sign up to tennis. I did so. We used to have a tennis lesson after school in the week, and then later I went to coaching sessions on the weekend, which I'm sure I remember only being about 6 quid for an hour's group coaching. I did this all the way through my teens until I got a bit older and gave it up for other pursuits. Don't understand the elitism comments at all.
When I went to the weekend coaching, there were levels of ability so you would go up and down depending on who good you were. The guys at the top level had one on one coaching and a select few were entered onto the national tournaments and that I think. I was never good enough for any of that, I think I only moved between the 2nd and 3rd levels.Was it just an after school fun activity? Or were there some decent players who then went for one to one? Lots of courses in our area now do kids golf group lessons for peanuts too. But if you want to pursue it properly the costs escalate quickly. As it does with tennis also.
Perhaps it was a regional thing and you were in a good area. Perhaps I was in a bad area? I can only go off my own experiences but if they are not reflective then I am pleased to hear it.Sorry, just catching up the last 4 pages and picked this as one example of many posts about 'elitism' in tennis. I'm very surprised to hear that is many people's views. Back in secondary school a tennis coaching academy came into the school and asked if anyone wanted to sign up to tennis. I did so. We used to have a tennis lesson after school in the week, and then later I went to coaching sessions on the weekend, which I'm sure I remember only being about 6 quid for an hour's group coaching. I did this all the way through my teens until I got a bit older and gave it up for other pursuits. Don't understand the elitism comments at all.
That’s what I’d expect. Nice and cheap and fun for the masses. Then the select few if they wanted to go anywhere with it would need extra (at extra expense). As was discussed on here, tennis was easily accessible to play for fun but just as elitist (expensive) to pursue properly.When I went to the weekend coaching, there were levels of ability so you would go up and down depending on who good you were. The guys at the top level had one on one coaching and a select few were entered onto the national tournaments and that I think. I was never good enough for any of that, I think I only moved between the 2nd and 3rd levels.
Yeah, I suppose so. It probably helps if your mum is already a tennis coach (as with Murray).That’s what I’d expect. Nice and cheap and fun for the masses. Then the select few if they wanted to go anywhere with it would need extra (at extra expense). As was discussed on here, tennis was easily accessible to play for fun but just as elitist (expensive) to pursue properly.
From commentary this morning it would appear AndyM has elected to have similiar surgery as Bob Bryan...
Can only continue to wish him well and hope to see him able to play again in the future...
Good that he's had the operation, but do we really think a) he can fully recover in time for Wimbledon and b) he'll manage to regain a full level of fitness to compete amongst the worlds best?
Personally I think the answer to both is no, but having said that I hope the surgery works for him and allows him to enjoy a long and pain free retirement, time with his family and that he can find himself a niche somewhere and enjoy a long, second career away from tennis