Old Skier
Tour Winner
I suspect that either the player didn’t select a partner to verify or the partner hasn’t verified the score.England golf app and the report is on the England golf WHS website
I suspect that either the player didn’t select a partner to verify or the partner hasn’t verified the score.England golf app and the report is on the England golf WHS website
I had a similar experience during testing it the other day and my issue was no/bad connectivity. Could be the issue. I deleted it off the WHS DB and then manually added scores.haing spoken to the player in question I am assured they followed the apps instructions.
Given the MyEG app now does a better job, I've disabled HDID for general play/casual rounds until Club Systems get it up to the required level of functionality.I've had yet another general play round submitted as "Non Qualifying" on howdidido. So, I've had to go into the system and re-enter this score for the player correctly.
Out of my continued frustration, I've e-mailed Club V1 to state that qualifying is no longer a recognised definition as confusing to many club golfers, despite me sending out e-mails and putting notices on noticeboard to select "qualifying". I've asked why acceptable for handicap and not acceptable for handicap cannot be used. I've also brought up the point that surely "General Play Round" would be a better option than "Casual Round", again fitting with WHS.
They have acknowledged the e-mail and said they'd pass it on to the development team. Hopefully it will be something they will change. I hope other clubs send them similar feedback so they act fairly soon.
My issue with MyEG is that it didn't know my location yesterday, despite being at course, so it was impossible to use.Given the MyEG app now does a better job, I've disabled HDID for general play/casual rounds until Club Systems get it up to the required level of functionality.
It's been disappointing to see how far CS have fallen behind their competitors in the last 12 months, particularly as far as development goes in getting ClubV1 and HDID fully functional for WHS.
EG is good but does require decent access, either to the interweb or via 4G, we have neither unless we are actually in the clubhouse.My issue with MyEG is that it didn't know my location yesterday, despite being at course, so it was impossible to use.
Now, not ruling out I'm being a numpty. But, I can find no way to find any settings on MyEG to ensure it can access my GPS. But it could before Xmas (when checking handicap at away course) and general phone has location settings on.
Mind you, using howdidido, although you can include marker, I do not believe that marker is ever sent a notification to verify a score? MyEG seems to do that, which is good (except what if your marker is IT illiterate and doesn't verify it?)
I hear that EG will be issuing a user guide soon - no idea why they thought it was acceptable to release the app without one.EG is good but does require decent access, either to the interweb or via 4G, we have neither unless we are actually in the clubhouse.
Had several cases of markers not being able to work out how to verify the score.
I hear that EG will be issuing a user guide soon - no idea why they thought it was acceptable to release the app without one.
Of course they mean "tee marker", but I presume the abbreviated terminology comes from the New Zealand developers as just "marker" seems to be used throughout their systems.Before they write a user guide, maybe they should first stop using the term "marker" when they actually mean "tee". That would stop some basic confusion....had two people now ask me why, when they wanted to select the person who would be marking their card, that it only gave the options of White or Yellow and not any players names!!!!!
Good idea. Deploy the app, get people frustrated and saying the app is rubbish, the issue the user guide....priceless.I hear that EG will be issuing a user guide soon - no idea why they thought it was acceptable to release the app without one.
Of course they mean "tee marker", but I presume the abbreviated terminology comes from the New Zealand developers as just "marker" seems to be used throughout their systems.
It is normally applied globally but exceptionally it may be applied to certain competitions or spanning certain times of the day. See Rule 5.6 InterpretationsQuestion about the PCC calculation....
For each day is a PCC calculated for each set of tees.....or is just one PCC calculated and applied to all tees?
Looking at results so far where a PCC has been calculated it appears to be the latter. Only noticed it as only 4 ladies played in a particular mixed comp (so not enough players to do a PCC comp as defined on p55 of the Rules of H'capping) off the red tees, but the same PCC was applied to their scores as it was to the 66 male players who had played off the whites.
Only conclusion is that the PCC is applied globally across all players, unlike in the old CONGU scheme where separate CSS calculations were done for men and ladies.
It is normally applied globally but exceptionally it may be applied to certain competitions or spanning certain times of the day. See Rule 5.6 Interpretations
As does the weather.cheers...i see point 5 says ....determine how much harder or easier the golf course played that day.
I guess golf course covers all different tees.
I sent them a similar note. I also suggested they drop the Qual / non-Qual completely as why would you enter scores if you didn't want them to count to handicap?I've had yet another general play round submitted as "Non Qualifying" on howdidido. So, I've had to go into the system and re-enter this score for the player correctly.
Out of my continued frustration, I've e-mailed Club V1 to state that qualifying is no longer a recognised definition as confusing to many club golfers, despite me sending out e-mails and putting notices on noticeboard to select "qualifying". I've asked why acceptable for handicap and not acceptable for handicap cannot be used. I've also brought up the point that surely "General Play Round" would be a better option than "Casual Round", again fitting with WHS.
They have acknowledged the e-mail and said they'd pass it on to the development team. Hopefully it will be something they will change. I hope other clubs send them similar feedback so they act fairly soon.