Swango1980
Well-known member
So, it is OK for the Captain to play on the PGA Tour, a rival Tour to the European Tour, that holds events at the same time as ET events. And, your only justification is that is OK, some of his players will be playing there? I bet you wouldn't make that justification for LIV, if some of the best Europeans played on that and Stenson could have seen how they were playing.Why skip over it ? The football analogy has been used to justify the players moving to LiV ?
Is it not a case if Stenson wanting the best of both worlds ? Everything suited for him as opposed to what suits the ET Ryder Cup ?
Can you really not see why they wouldn’t want their captain to be involved in what’s essentially right now a rival Tour that’s threatening the ET ? Why on Earth would they allow their Captain to go off to the LiV tour ? The LIV events are at the same time as some ET events - surely the captain should be fully focused on that or the PGA event where some of his players will be playing ?
It’s not petty , it’s not silly - it’s very sensible to remove him from the captaincy - Stenson had a choice , and he picked the money ?, that’s his choice at the end of the day , but he and indeed all the others can’t have their cake on all sides of the fence , they make their choices knowing the potential consequences so it’s now up to them to live with them
And I suspect most of them have already that level of money to set themselves up .
That one paragraph screams of someone trying to carefully script an argument to completely back their point, and completely blind to the contradictions within it.