The Footie Thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date

Lord Tyrion

Money List Winner
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
28,673
Location
Northumberland
Visit site
It didn't look like the VAR showed the onfield ref the foul in the lead up to the goal. If its shown then it changes the outcome. I felt for Wolves and O'Neil yesterday, they were good value for the draw.
It doesn't get shown to him if the VAR doesn't see an issue with it. He didn't. I'm with the onfield ref and the VAR on this one. It was a good tackle, no foul.
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
12,612
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
It doesn't get shown to him if the VAR doesn't see an issue with it. He didn't. I'm with the onfield ref and the VAR on this one. It was a good tackle, no foul.
Can't comment on the challenge, can't remember it. But, is it a challenge that happened before the Man City corner than lead to the winner? If so, VAR couldn't do anything anyway even if they thought it was a foul, because the ball had gone out of play and put back into play since then. Only way they could have got involved is if they thought it was worth a red card (which obviously isn't the case from what the discussion is)
 

HomerJSimpson

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
73,205
Location
Bracknell - Berkshire
Visit site
😂😂 we’ll agree to disagree, not in a million years was Jones trying to nutmeg the keeper.👍🏻
Agreed and the keeper did nothing wrong but this will keep going round and round.

The issue of a keeper diving at a players feet and them running into the keeper is a mess and the poor keeper has no chance. If he feels he has to come out and spread himself AND touches the ball first why do penalties get given when the attacker then runs into the outstretched arm. The keeper isn't being reckless but making a save
 

Arthur Wedge

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2024
Messages
3,206
Location
Leighton Buzzard
Visit site
It didn't look like the VAR showed the onfield ref the foul in the lead up to the goal. If its shown then it changes the outcome. I felt for Wolves and O'Neil yesterday, they were good value for the draw.

It wasn’t a foul and it was also at the very least 4 phases previously so not part of the phase when the goal was scored
 

Bazz

Q-School Graduate
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
3,011
Location
Wolverhampton
Visit site
Always said that their squad looked very thin even more so letting the likes of Smith Rowe and Eketiah go etc

Still think City will win but the next couple of weeks will test Slot



Is that the Nunes tackle ? Watched it again ( after LT said it was clean ) and it was a very clean tackle

Not for me Arthur.
 

Arthur Wedge

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2024
Messages
3,206
Location
Leighton Buzzard
Visit site
If you spent less time arguing and going round in circles you would know exactly what i am talking about. It is very clear.

It didn't look like the VAR showed the onfield ref the foul in the lead up to the goal. If its shown then it changes the outcome. I felt for Wolves and O'Neil yesterday, they were good value for the draw.

So which game are you talking about if it isn’t the Wolves game 🤷‍♂️

And which foul in the lead up to the goal
 

Morfeen75

Active member
Joined
May 25, 2024
Messages
323
Location
Surrey
Visit site
Ah, fair enough. I was talking about the Wolves v Man City game from yesterday. Dull game, you didn't miss much.

So which game are you talking about if it isn’t the Wolves game 🤷‍♂️

And which foul in the lead up to the goal
Did you not see the foul on the keeper by Bernado Silva seconds before the john stones header?
 
Top