Fade and Die
Medal Winner
Neither had the umpires that’s for sure otherwise they would have just made the call. Match referee called it I reckon.
The Cricket Thread
- Thread starter fundy
- Start date
Neither had the umpires that’s for sure otherwise they would have just made the call. Match referee called it I reckon.
D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
Cox was in contact with Bell-Drummond who was in contact with the boundary so a 6 was the correct decision
D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
Shocking decision ???
Fade and Die
Medal Winner
But after the catch was taken.
D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
Wow that’s a bit special ?
that’s won it ?
that’s won it ?
D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
Doesn’t matter - it’s the same as you can’t take the catch and be stood on the boundary
Wilson
Head Pro
Is that the rule Phil, or an assumption based on the rule we know about treading on the boundary? I would have thought the ball was dead once the catch was taken? Bumble says it’s should be out…
Amazing fielding for the last catch!
Fade and Die
Medal Winner
Not convinced it is the same. Interested to hear what Bumble is going to say when there is a break in the action.
Somerset fan by any chance?
The catcher wasn’t stood on the boundary
D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
There is a rule about helping someone take the catch so that he could be stood on the rope lifting the player up and he catches the ball. The one issue was when the catch is “complete” -
How was bell-Drummond helping him?
Fade and Die
Medal Winner
Think Bumble just explained it well enough, the catch was taken and completed whilst the catcher was nowhere near the boundary. What the fella is doing laying on the floor is irrelevant. It’s Out!
D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
But the catcher was in contact with someone stood on the boundary. But then the umpire did get LBW to a ball missing by a significant amount
Fade and Die
Medal Winner
Nas said it has to be intentional help. Do you think Bell Drummond was intentionally helping? Do you think he helped at all?
He wasn’t stood on the boundary
D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
Bell Drummond was and Cox was in contact with him ?
Was it as shocking as the LBW against Lammonby
Bell Drummond was and Cox was in contact with him ?
Was it as shocking as the LBW against Lammonby
Bell Drummond was on his arse looking the other way - there was NO intent to help
D
Deleted member 15344
Guest
The umpires with the help of the third umpire made the call and even now people are split about it
Fade and Die
Medal Winner
Bell Drummond was and Cox was in contact with him ?
Was it as shocking as the LBW against Lammonby
Do two wrongs make a right then? Just two bits of poor umpiring I think.
