The Cricket Thread

D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
Well can’t blame the pitch today - some poor batting at times - shoold have at least reached 250
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
Well that’s a nice way to start

And please CH4 get rid of Ranford - just an awful pundit
 

Imurg

The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
37,716
Location
Aylesbury Bucks
Visit site
It's good to see this turning into a relatively even contest...
A couple of wickets now and its about even.
Pitch doing a bit but there's runs to be had.
Much more like it.
 
D

Deleted Member 1156

Guest
It's good to see this turning into a relatively even contest...
A couple of wickets now and its about even.
Pitch doing a bit but there's runs to be had.
Much more like it.
It's game on now ?
 

Imurg

The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
37,716
Location
Aylesbury Bucks
Visit site
Can someone explain Umpires Call please?
Ball pitched in line, hit the pad in line, no bat involved, tech says ball hitting top of the stumps
How is that not out?
Don't they use the tech to help them.?
 
D

Deleted Member 1156

Guest
Can someone explain Umpires Call please?
Ball pitched in line, hit the pad in line, no bat involved, tech says ball hitting top of the stumps
How is that not out?
Don't they use the tech to help them.?
I'm stumped by that decision too.


See what I did there ?
 

patricks148

Global Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
24,646
Location
Highlands
Visit site
i think if its given Not Out then hit has to have the whole ball hitting the stumps not just part of it.

might be one of the things changed next time they review the rules on DRS, but who knows
 

Imurg

The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
37,716
Location
Aylesbury Bucks
Visit site
i think if its given Not Out then hit has to have the whole ball hitting the stumps not just part of it.

might be one of the things changed next time they review the rules on DRS, but who knows
Theyve just explained it, pretty much like that but I thought I heard that more than 50% of the ball has to be hitting.
So they're admitting that the accuracy of the tech is half a ball width out.......
 

patricks148

Global Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
24,646
Location
Highlands
Visit site
Theyve just explained it, pretty much like that but I thought I heard that more than 50% of the ball has to be hitting.
So they're admitting that the accuracy of the tech is half a ball width out.......
sounds about right, i supposed theres "benifit of the doubt" that has to go to the batsman if its only a small part of the ball hitting.
 
Top