Imurg
The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
I think Ben Stokes needs to have a quiet word with him...
Behind the bike sheds.....
I think Ben Stokes needs to have a quiet word with him...
How is that Not Out
The BCI has not traditionally been a fan of the DRS. I am sure that they were the last major test natio to take it on. They wanted to keep the umpires in charge of the game with the vagaries that that brought.
The BCI has not traditionally been a fan of the DRS. I am sure that they were the last major test natio to take it on. They wanted to keep the umpires in charge of the game with the vagaries that that brought.
Who makes the DRS software? I am assuming it is made by a Indian software company... can they tweak it .... (just asking)
I we are going to discuss DRS software, but I have my suspicions on how ultra edge is being used in the current test.
- Usually, the "flat line" before the ball hits the bat or pad isn't completely flat, there's always a bit of background noise picked up, then we see the spike of contact.
- In this series, when India is batting, the ultra edge flat line is completely flat, like it's not switched on, and then comes to life when the ball hits the pad. It feels like ultra edge is being switched off until the ball has passed the bat.
- When England is batting, you can see a bit of distortion in the flat line before impact, as I'm used to seeing.
This is a massively cynical post, probably completely unfounded, but it was something I noticed before the third umpire started making dodgy decisions over the weekend.
Yep. An entertaining 10 minutes but the pitch was a disgrace. But then, so was our batting.Enjoying this little cameo by Moeen.
The pitch is a disgrace for a 4th day though.
Sounds like a lot of sour grapes above. India scored over 600 runs so the wicket couldn't have been that bad. And it's not as if England don't prepare wickets to suit them in home tests.
India batted well and 2 standout performances and some great support earned them the victory.
What I am saying is that the toss is too important on decks like that. Winning the toss will give you a huge advantage and is probably equivalent to 120 - 150 runs in the first dig and 50 - 75 in the second dig if you bat on day 3. That's huge. Of course the team has to play well to achieve/earn those numbers but it certainly is easier for them. The result might have been different if the toss had gone the other way.
England were outplayed in all 3 facets in this game and would probably have lost on a road.Did the toss really really give them such a huge advantage? The fact that India only scored 40 runs less in their 2nd innings than in the first suggests the wicket didn't deteriorate as massively as some have said. (I could also point to the fact that England scored more in their 2nd innings that in their 1st, but they batted so badly in both that it's not worth comparing.)
Both of these statements can be correct. England were poor and the wicket was a disgrace. I hate seeing home nations prepare tracks to suit themselves but this one was one of the worst examples of it. I'd like the ICC to step in with wicket prep because it's good to see the away team win on fair tracks.Did the toss really really give them such a huge advantage? The fact that India only scored 40 runs less in their 2nd innings than in the first suggests the wicket didn't deteriorate as massively as some have said. (I could also point to the fact that England scored more in their 2nd innings that in their 1st, but they batted so badly in both that it's not worth comparing.)