The Cricket Thread

Billysboots

Falling apart at the seams
Moderator
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
7,368
Visit site
I’d prefer a specialist keeper all day long in the 5-day format. Dropped catches generally cost runs, and you have to take the chances which come your way in Test matches, especially when you’re up against better opposition.

No point playing a wicketkeeper/batsman if they spill chances unless they can be relied upon to contribute regular big scores themselves.
 

Piece

Tour Winner
Joined
May 16, 2011
Messages
7,957
Location
South West Surrey
Visit site
It should always be a specialist wicket keeper, no debate in this household. You can hide a part time keeper in a decent side, which isn't England at all.

When you are an average side, all the little bits matter. You can't afford to fritter away chances. You also can't have a half-cocked plan or selection policy. Finally, you can't have a captain who falls short tactically.

I'm hoping we can turn it around but it's the hope that kills you not the reality ?
 

Billysboots

Falling apart at the seams
Moderator
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
7,368
Visit site
I’m really missing the Sky coverage of The Ashes. Matt Smith as a presenter is pretty cringeworthy, having little knowledge of his subject matter, and I’m also not a fan at all of the wall to wall Australian commentary.

Still, at least I’ve got England making 600+ and then rolling the Aussies over for 150 to look forward to.
 

fundy

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
27,053
Location
Herts/Beds border
Visit site
I’m really missing the Sky coverage of The Ashes. Matt Smith as a presenter is pretty cringeworthy, having little knowledge of his subject matter, and I’m also not a fan at all of the wall to wall Australian commentary.

Still, at least I’ve got England making 600+ and then rolling the Aussies over for 150 to look forward to.

damn i had 20/3 in the sweepstake, done by the weather lol
 

Billysboots

Falling apart at the seams
Moderator
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
7,368
Visit site
That was sadly predictable. Both English openers have techniques which will never come close to allowing them to perform consistently well at this level. Just awful to watch, especially if you bat at three or four!
 

sunshine

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2018
Messages
5,532
Visit site
The weather comes to the rescue! England could have been 3 or 4 down at close otherwise.

At no point have I ever looked at Burns and thought "test class batsman". Has anyone else?
Hameed I think could do a job. Just needs a breakthrough score to boost his confidence, but he's probably better suited to batting on the sub-continent rather than bouncy Australian wickets.

Fortunately for Buttler, his calamitous drop on day one wasn't too expensive. I'm going to go against the majority on this forum here: I understand the logic for having Buttler behind the stumps. His keeping is 7/10 (compared to Foakes 9/10), which is good enough, and coming in late middle order he can be explosive and have a massive impact. Generally his keeping hasn't featured too many errors, it's a lot better than Bairstow's for example. The problem is when he doesn't keep well and doesn't score enough runs... he seems to have a mental block at the moment. It's not all his fault, the England top order is so weak he is always coming in to try and rescue the innings instead of building on a solid platform.
 

sunshine

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2018
Messages
5,532
Visit site
Jos Buttler test batting average 33.3
Ben Foakes test batting average 31.5

Is less than 2 runs per innings worth the dropped catches? Not in my view.

Totally agree with you. The rationale for Buttler makes sense, but in practice it hasn't worked out.

The worry for me is that if Foakes came in to this side in its current state we would see his test average tumble.
 

fundy

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
27,053
Location
Herts/Beds border
Visit site
Totally agree with you. The rationale for Buttler makes sense, but in practice it hasn't worked out.

The worry for me is that if Foakes came in to this side in its current state we would see his test average tumble.


I think they want him coming in at 200/5 or better against tired attacks, instead of 80/5 against a bowling attack with the tail up! There are clearly situations as a batting side having Buttler come in at 7 should be a massive positive, sadly the England top order arent able to produce these opportunities often enough for picking him to make any sense, especially when he is shelling routine chances against the best batters in the world.

For those wanting Foakes, no doubt theyll give Bairstow another go first!
 
D

Deleted member 3432

Guest
An Adam Gilchrist in is prime wouldn't make any difference to this England team.

You can't win Ashes test matches with a non existent top three. Waste of time discussing who takes the gloves when the big problem is at the top of the order.
 

Lord Tyrion

Money List Winner
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
28,813
Location
Northumberland
Visit site
Totally agree with you. The rationale for Buttler makes sense, but in practice it hasn't worked out.

The worry for me is that if Foakes came in to this side in its current state we would see his test average tumble.
I think Fundy has it dead right, Buttler against a tiring attack with full freedom would be wonderful. The number of times that happens, particularly away from home, is increasingly rare and so we get indecisive Jos plus dropped catches.

In terms of Foakes, there is only one way to find out..........
 

HomerJSimpson

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
73,206
Location
Bracknell - Berkshire
Visit site
I think Fundy has it dead right, Buttler against a tiring attack with full freedom would be wonderful. The number of times that happens, particularly away from home, is increasingly rare and so we get indecisive Jos plus dropped catches.

In terms of Foakes, there is only one way to find out..........

Only one way to tell and given the marginal test average difference why not. Buttler's average will inevitably go down during this season so why not then put Foakes in and see if he can claim a place
 

3offTheTee

Tour Rookie
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
3,391
Location
Cumbria
Visit site
Only one way to tell and given the marginal test average difference why not. Buttler's average will inevitably go down during this season so why not then put Foakes in and see if he can claim a place
Not sure whether JB’s average will necessary go down but you are probably correct. He was top scorer in the first innings in Brisbane, little to beat, and averaged 31. His average in 24 innings during 2020/21 is 34 which is acceptable. One of the catches in the first test my 11 year old grandson could have caught but it is being assumed that Foakes would have taken it. 9 out of 10 times so would Buttler. The problem is not Buttler but higher up the order.
 

Blue in Munich

Crocked Professional Yeti Impersonator
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
14,097
Location
Worcester Park
Visit site
It’s all very depressing to watch.

Poor selection, poor tactics, poor captaincy, and for the most part poor application, certainly by our batters.

Glenn McGrath gets some stick for trotting out his 5-0 prediction whenever England head to Australia for an Ashes series, but he’s bang on the money this time.

In fact, this England side is so bad I’m not ruling out the possibility that they could lose a five match series 6-0 ?

Even a busted clock is right twice a day...
 
Top