PJ87
Journeyman Pro
I agree in part. The main challenge is people's attitudes won't change until real progress is seen outside of cities.
I live fairly rural and we should have 15 points within a 3 mile drive. Of those, 2 are always in use, 4 have never worked (at all) and 4 haven't even actually been installed.
My main concern, and the whole ICE cars have loads of parts argument, is that EVs don't. If my O2 sensor goes, I know what it is and I replace it. If my clutch goes, its just the clutch not the whole engine.
Most EVs that I have seen work on completely sealed single unit motors. If that goes its the whole thing that needs replaced .
It is improving, no one can deny. But the drawbacks and flaws need to be acknowledged on both sides, not just the selected side, in order for the argument to hold water.
There are clearly flaws on both sides however an important point people fail to acknowledge is that we need to change , oil is running out long term, we are on verge of climate disaster
Yet people won't make a switch unless it is to something exactly the same as they have now
Another one is meat. People love meat and if came a time we had to stop eating it people won't adoppt a change to make sure the world actually survives because it's inconvenient
Not saying we should do either .. but a slight adaptation of lifestyle compromise to get something that will benefit the planet