Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
The plant is closing because of the lack of demand for EV Vans but the plant has to produce them - so they close one plant and just leave one open
The plant is closing because of the lack of demand for EV Vans but the plant has to produce them - so they close one plant and just leave one open
No one said they were the end game. in 2026 F1 will be using totally sustainable fuels. Man made fuel for all ICE will follow, sooner than you want to admit.Been doing so for years. Still require a lot of power to produce where as an EV is the most efficient way of doing it.
E fuels have a place but they are part of the picture not the end game.
No one said they were the end game. in 2026 F1 will be using totally sustainable fuels. Man made fuel for all ICE will follow, sooner than you want to admit.
Not buying into something that many don't see as the solution or a viable financial option are good enough reasons for many to hold on to, or even buy new, an ICE, especially with the prospect of a carbon neutral man made fuel arriving some time in the not to distant furture.
There is a demand there, it's just that the range is pointless and the cost to purchase rediculous.The plant is closing because of the lack of demand for EV Vans but the plant has to produce them - so they close one plant and just leave one open
But nobody wants EV vans because they are crap.The plant is closing because of the lack of demand for EV Vans but the plant has to produce them - so they close one plant and just leave one open
But nobody wants EV vans because they are crap.
Fleets just aren’t wanting electric vans as new van sales decline in July - Broker News
Overall the July van market sees second successive monthly decrease in sales registrations as fleets shun electric vansbrokernews.co.uk
They are an oxymoron currently.. add more range and you lose load capacity ( kgs not volume)But nobody wants EV vans because they are crap.
Fleets just aren’t wanting electric vans as new van sales decline in July - Broker News
Overall the July van market sees second successive monthly decrease in sales registrations as fleets shun electric vansbrokernews.co.uk
They are an oxymoron currently.. add more range and you lose load capacity ( kgs not volume)
I suppose there is a place for them but you need to restructure your approach and given the delivery companies are on a ridiculous time efficiency plan where they ring doorbell’s and run away or Chuck it over fences you can see that EV vans may not be suitable.
So if you want to make stuff work you need to adapt your approach… and currently I can’t see that happening.
Agreed, EV cars for around town are great, Van as BM said, anyone who has one seem to regret them.Vans are too heavy. Now returning to @Bunkermagnet point e fuels are perfect for vans because they you don't need to produce ev vans that don't suit and people can use e fuels
Save the EVs for cars which have proven to be more than capable
I think the 2 you have mentioned have embraced them but I think they have been caught out a few times as well ..They seem to work very well for the likes of Tesco and DPD for their local deliveries which is a very good use of them
However builders I can't see why they would embrace them when they need to do serious milage in their vans
Find the perfect match like mini cabs. They are perfect to be EVs. 200 miles a day will be plenty . Recharge at night happy days
But the man in the van not so much
I think the 2 you have mentioned have embraced them but I think they have been caught out a few times as well ..
But like you say the builders and tradesmen may not so inclined, but when you can charge up on your drive you can do jobs within 100miles .. Also big contractors do have chargers on site ( connected up to diesel generators ). I suppose it’s more to do with cost ..
Agreed, EV cars for around town are great, Van as BM said, anyone who has one seem to regret them.
On the subject, I have to visit a site tomorrow with a view to remove/relocate 5 EV chargers installed under a block of HRHR (high rise, high risk) flats, apparently the fire brigade wants them removing under the 2022 Building safety Act.
As I posted
View attachment 56045
They may be part of the solution but they still dont solve the problem considering how much energy is needed to be produced to travel.. 5 times less efficient than an EV
Kia announced a few days ago they are about to launch a hydrogen car in Australia. A network of hydrogen stations is already in place. There was a great graphic about CO2 to go with it. It very much contradicts your graphic.
Sythentic fuels will have a part to play, but not at the volume required to replace fossil. Will be some niche usesNo one said they were the end game. in 2026 F1 will be using totally sustainable fuels. Man made fuel for all ICE will follow, sooner than you want to admit.
Not buying into something that many don't see as the solution or a viable financial option are good enough reasons for many to hold on to, or even buy new, an ICE, especially with the prospect of a carbon neutral man made fuel arriving some time in the not to distant furture.
Ah hydrogen the great hero of 0 emission cars. Like sythentic fuels , it will have its uses but I'd be surpised to see it as the main fuel.Kia announced a few days ago they are about to launch a hydrogen car in Australia. A network of hydrogen stations is already in place. There was a great graphic about CO2 to go with it. It very much contradicts your graphic.
Does it? My graphic is clear. It's about how much energy used to travel that far
Doesn't mention co2
Ah hydrogen the great hero of 0 emission cars. Like sythentic fuels , it will have its uses but I'd be surpised to see it as the main fuel.
Ah hydrogen the great hero of 0 emission cars. Like sythentic fuels , it will have its uses but I'd be surpised to see it as the main fuel.