hambugerpete
Active member
The point made was India and China are doing very little wr net zero. Which we know is not true. No one has suggested we ignore them.
The point made was India and China are doing very little wr net zero. Which we know is not true. No one has suggested we ignore them.
No idea , my course is closed due to the large amount of rain we seem to get these days.Any idea when? I'm supposed to be playing golf on Sunday
We currently produce 0.8% of the worlds CO emissions, where is the sense in hamstringing our economy to reduce this already very low number? Our competitors are certainly not going to.The point made was India and China are doing very little wr net zero. Which we know is not true. No one has suggested we ignore them.
Interesting that the average rainfall in the last 24 years hasn’t changed muchNo idea , my course is closed due to the large amount of rain we seem to get these days.
Didn't need climate change to that did weWe currently produce 0.8% of the worlds CO emissions, where is the sense in hamstringing our economy to reduce this already very low number? Our competitors are certainly not going to.
Is it, how so. An average number has little meaning without context. What's the distribution throughout the year for example how has that changed over the decades? Why 24 years?Interesting that the average rainfall in the last 24 years hasn’t changed much
Been some big droughts as well
Interesting that the average rainfall in the last 24 years hasn’t changed much
Been some big droughts as well
The lack of understanding is staggering considering the amount of reading into things you do.
Floods have increased due to the change in rain patterns. Spain saw the worst floods due to a YEARS worth of rain fell in 8 hours. Process that for a minute. A years worth of rain in 8 hours. A year. Not a days worth. Not A month's worth.. a years worth.
Rainfall may not have once and droughts happen .. but instead of having stable rainfall that we can deal with and is important to how we live we have extremes. Extreme downpours and extreme shortages.
Sure it "levels out" over the year but doesn't make it less dangerous.
All of which have happened before - floods , droughts, it’s not new
It will happen again regardless of any net zero targets
Go back through history and find a time when we didn’t have changeable weather conditions - even before emissions pouring into the sky
I'm amazed that in this day and age there are still climate change deniers. Staggering tbh.Nothing happened on the levels we are seeing now. Not as frequent.
This is becoming a yearly occurrence.
It used to be once in a decade now it's every year
Denying that is pretty darn stupid
I'm amazed that in this day and age there are still climate change deniers. Staggering tbh.
You appear to be confusing weather and climate. They're not the same things you know.All of which have happened before - floods , droughts, it’s not new
It will happen again regardless of any net zero targets
Go back through history and find a time when we didn’t have changeable weather conditions - even before emissions pouring into the sky
I'm amazed that in this day and age there are still climate change deniers. Staggering tbh.
To be fair there as still people who think the earth is flat and that COVID was a conspiracy so their are a level above those knuckle draggers
So just a daft reply then Pete to what was a genuine question?Didn't need climate change to that did we
So just a daft reply then Pete to what was a genuine question?
Is this reply an attempt to answer the question I asked Pete?It's worrying that people would rather lose 25% of livable space In the world than 25% of their wealth.
Ironically those most vocal blame all their issues on immigration, just wait to see how many climate refugees will be made by ignoring climate change.
All the little boys will be sent down the pits again to push the coal trucks.What is the cost if we don’t
Why does it have to cripple the economy? Sorry thats just daily mail hyperbole, there is plenty of money to be made out of investing toward lessening the impact of climate change.Is this reply an attempt to answer the question I asked Pete?
We currently produce 0.8% of the worlds CO emissions, where is the sense in hamstringing our economy to reduce this already very low number? Our competitors are certainly not going to
If it is I’m afraid I do not understand what you mean.
The world economic forum reckons otherwise…Why does it have to cripple the economy? Sorry thats just daily mail hyperbole, there is plenty of money to be made out of investing toward lessening the impact of climate change.
Sadly many like to stick with what they know , with EVs being a Great example, with many preferring to believe rubbish about them as opposed to seriously look at getting one.