• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

The all things EV chat thread

We had these numbers here before, but they are still astonishing.

3.5 in ever 100 ice cars catch fire. That’s 1 fire in this road or the 2 next ones. All around the country. I have never seen a car fire.
Over 10k cars are stolen and set on fire each year.....
 
You have every right to be suspicious of those stats, just dont choose an ICE car over an EV because you think it is less likely to catch fire than an EV because it's not true.
Unless of course you have other evidence to prove otherwise.
I think you missed the point I was making.
I wasn't questioning the figures for ICE and EV cars. They could be right; they could be wrong.
I'm questioning why a hybrid (which has a combination of both technologies) is so astonishingly more likely to catch fire than the combination of both others.
What is it about having both ICE and EV in a car that causes the combined likelihood of a fire to be so dramatically greater?
Is there some kind of interaction between ICE and EV that turns it into a ticking time bomb?
I can't fathom what that might be.
So I prefer to wonder whether those stats might be a bit dubious.
That's all.
 
One of the better articles (IMO) about insurance….


“There’s far too much scaremongering across our industry about EVs,” says Cleevely. “The problem is the lack of understanding.”

The industry have fed this misunderstanding to the media who have fed it to the public.

Good article very well balanced

Almost out of place on this thread for being neutral 🤣
 
Please don't patronise me, I know exactly the point you were trying to make.

But I will repeat my question that you conveniently avoided answering.....
Do you have any evidence that proves your suspicion is correct?
No Bob, you can't wriggle out of it like that. Here's a direct quote from you:
just dont choose an ICE car over an EV because you think it is less likely to catch fire than an EV because it's not true.
Any rational person will interpret that as meaning that you think I believe an ICE car is less likely to catch fire than an EV.
Nowhere did I say that, or give the merest hint of such a belief.

To answer your follow up question:
The only evidence I have that my suspicion is correct is that the quoted statistics make no sense.
I'd like to have it explained to me why hybrids appear to be so incredibly prone to catching fire.
 
Copied from a fire industry website:-

Apparently, the presence of a gasoline enginge next to a high-powered electric battery system is the cause of most problems with hybrid cars. The combinations of these two together generate a lot of heat. This heat can be dangerous for the lithium-ion battery in the car and possibly cause a thermal runaway and fire.5 Oct 2022
 
Evidence is fact, not suspicion.
The statistics don't make sense to me - Fact.
Therefore I am suspicious that they are meaningless.

However:
Copied from a fire industry website:-

Apparently, the presence of a gasoline enginge next to a high-powered electric battery system is the cause of most problems with hybrid cars. The combinations of these two together generate a lot of heat. This heat can be dangerous for the lithium-ion battery in the car and possibly cause a thermal runaway and fire.5 Oct 2022
Thank you. At last someone has provided a plausible explanation why hybrids are so prone to fires. My suspicions about the statistics are assuaged.

Sounds like the battery in a hybrid should ideally be located far away from the engine. Hybrid batteries tend to be fairly low capacity, so one would have thought this shouldn't be too difficult. Hopefully the industry will get on top of it.
 
If hybrids are so dangerous, why are 90% of taxi drivers using Corolla hybrids?

The numbers quoted seem high. If it was that great a problem, would it not be all over the news? Would Toyota not have closed down?
 
If hybrids are so dangerous, why are 90% of taxi drivers using Corolla hybrids?

The numbers quoted seem high. If it was that great a problem, would it not be all over the news? Would Toyota not have closed down?
Australia’s Department of Defence funded EV FireSafe to look into the question. It found there was a 0.0012% chance of a passenger electric vehicle battery catching fire, compared with a 0.1% chance for internal combustion engine cars. (The Home Office said it was unable to provide data for the UK.)

Either number is not enough of a risk to write home about

Source

 
If hybrids are so dangerous, why are 90% of taxi drivers using Corolla hybrids?

The numbers quoted seem high. If it was that great a problem, would it not be all over the news? Would Toyota not have closed down?
The pious hybrid is very popular this way to with taxi's, but in Town it's the MG5 (low rent estate) or Kia Niro leccy and hybrid.
All are models to steer clear of if looking for used to me.
Personally I don't belive the fire statistic either.
 
Can we all at least agree that ICE cars and hybrids are more likely to catch fire than EVs?
Since theres millions more ICE cars than Ev, probably so.HOWEVER, why not look at the persentage difference in fires from ICE to EV's from when EV's actually became a reasonable number sold. That would be more telling.
 
Australia’s Department of Defence funded EV FireSafe to look into the question. It found there was a 0.0012% chance of a passenger electric vehicle battery catching fire, compared with a 0.1% chance for internal combustion engine cars. (The Home Office said it was unable to provide data for the UK.)

 
Top