sam85
Head Pro
And your point is? Most times it's fine, but I am occasionally randomly irritated by the thieving sods who reduce the size of the available pot which the other 3 members have accrued, make no contribution to the winning of the pot and then waltz off with the money that they've done nothing to earn. I'm not sure what's not to understand.
I've always thought that logically speaking in most circumstances it's better for the final contestant to either take the lower offer or the higher offer when there is already 3 players through.