not sure if you can say that put him off the ball was well on the way to the hole before the call
With this having happened, I think it could open the floodgates when he starts playing events in more populated areas.
Could be that there's multiple people shouting it over every shot and he has to learn to deal with that or plummet down the rankings.
It's remarkable the tour have stuck by him so much and haven't really issued any punishment following the bunker incident. Personally think he should have had to miss a few events.
I think the tour are so afraid of taking serious punishment as they don't want to risk a big player getting caught in a similar incident, and suddenly he's missing events that Sponsors are paying millions to get in on.
Would Sentry have been bothered if Reed was banned from this event? Well him being there certainly gave the event (and therefore the sponsor) that bit more coverage than they might have got had he not been there.
But what if it was a more popular guy that that fans and sponsors care more about. They have shown time and time again, they just don't want to set a precedent for banning players. Spieth not playing enough new events in 2018, as one more example when a player escaped punishment.
Why should be banned ?!With this having happened, I think it could open the floodgates when he starts playing events in more populated areas.
Could be that there's multiple people shouting it over every shot and he has to learn to deal with that or plummet down the rankings.
It's remarkable the tour have stuck by him so much and haven't really issued any punishment following the bunker incident. Personally think he should have had to miss a few events.
I think the tour are so afraid of taking serious punishment as they don't want to risk a big player getting caught in a similar incident, and suddenly he's missing events that Sponsors are paying millions to get in on.
Would Sentry have been bothered if Reed was banned from this event? Well him being there certainly gave the event (and therefore the sponsor) that bit more coverage than they might have got had he not been there.
But what if it was a more popular guy that that fans and sponsors care more about. They have shown time and time again, they just don't want to set a precedent for banning players. Spieth not playing enough new events in 2018, as one more example when a player escaped punishment.
No it's not he got a penalty.
Why should be banned ?!
He was penalised for his rule break at the time so why ban him ?
He got a 2 shot penalty because the tour accepted his explanation that he improved his lie accidentally rather than intentionally.
If you believe that, then I have a bridge to sell you.
Simon Dyson touched the line of his putt and got a 2 month ban, which imo is the kind of thing that should have happened here.
Being labelled a cheat is the hardest thing to move on from. If people believed he actually did it intentionally, and therefore cheated (which they have reasonable grounds to do so), then they will always label him a cheat. It is not so easy to say "he got a penalty, move on" as if everyone who believes he cheated are now to simply forget it ever happened.The key is "in your opinion".
It's been dealt with. Move on.
He got a 2 shot penalty because the tour accepted his explanation that he improved his lie accidentally rather than intentionally.
If you believe that, then I have a bridge to sell you.
Simon Dyson touched the line of his putt and got a 2 month ban, which imo is the kind of thing that should have happened here.
Being labelled a cheat is the hardest thing to move on from. If people believed he actually did it intentionally, and therefore cheated (which they have reasonable grounds to do so), then they will always label him a cheat. It is not so easy to say "he got a penalty, move on" as if everyone who believes he cheated are now to simply forget it ever happened.
I'm not eating myself up at all. I simply continue to have my opinion. But equally, don't continue to eat yourself up because others are not moving on like you hope. Expect the topic to be discussed long into the future on this forum and other media.Feel free to continue to eat yourself up. I'll move on.
Dyson got a “suspended” ban for deliberately improving his lie by patting down a spike mark in front of his ball when he knew that’s not allowed in the rules
Can you prove that Reed did it deliberatly- as you can’t then he was penalised under golf rules and we move on.
Any examples of what happens when a pro admits to cheating as he subsequently felt very guilty about doing so and asks to be forgiven? Whether he was caught doing so or not I'm not sure matters if you admit it - but how was that admission received - how would it be received?
Reed's going to get the shouts all year, and rightly so. He's a cheat, got away with a far too lenient penalty and was even applauded by the PGA Tour for "being a gentleman", it's embarrassing. He's going to get absolutely nailed in Phoenix, and it's going to be hilarious.
Hilarious? Going to your work place to be abused is hilarious? I find it very sad.
As for the phoenix that tournament should be banned. It's an embarrassment to golf.