D
Deleted member 21445
Guest
Gordon Bennett!!! What about that amateur chap? What's his name...
That's some playing!
Thats what we should be talking about, incredible
Gordon Bennett!!! What about that amateur chap? What's his name...
That's some playing!
Blimey didnāt realise he hit that much further than Koepka - so is it giving advice when the player is that far ahead of him.
Do they put their fingers in their ears on par 3 tees to avoid hearing what their playing partners are using?
Plus side of Rory going out Is itāll give my EW bets an extra spot as I was concerned heād do the typical Sunday run through the field and cost me
Seems theres been at least 2 big trees down at Augusta, doesnt sound good
Sandy Lyle at +19 makes a mockery of former champions getting lifetime exemptions. What's the point of him being there more than 30 shots off the lead? It's a bit like Martina Navratilova and John McEnroe getting an invite to play at Wimbledon just because they won it many years ago when they were good.
Why not tho? They don't kick anyone else out so not like their costing someone else a valid place
Couples is 63 and on plus 1 at the moment for the tournament
4 shots ahead than the number 2 golfer in world finished
I think it's brilliant, it's up to them aswell, faldo doesn't do it but if at any point he decided yeah I'm gonna give a go for the craic would be great to see
Sandy Lyle at +19 makes a mockery of former champions getting lifetime exemptions. What's the point of him being there more than 30 shots off the lead? It's a bit like Martina Navratilova and John McEnroe getting an invite to play at Wimbledon just because they won it many years ago when they were good.
Each to their own, but I watch professional golf to see the best players in the world competing, not to watch some washed up has-been hack it round a golf course. The Masters is meant to be one of the top 4 tournaments in the world but they let in any former winner that wants to play. I've no problem with an exemption for past winners but in my opinion they should limit it to 5 or 10 years. If Lyle wants to continue playing then that's what the seniors tour is for.
Faldo is pissed hereHow can anyone take issue with watching Fred Couples? What an absolute boss.
Faldoās been great, not sure iāve always liked him too much, but his insight has been fantastic and heās been on top form.
If Lyle wasn't there, or Larry Mize for that matter, then they could invite two others who might actually compete.Yet it's no affect to the event at all. He can play either way and it doesn't stop someone else so him being there if he hacks it round doesn't overly matter
How much have we seen of him being so far behind?
They don't take anyone else's spot so it makes no difference. Freddie cCouples has just outplayed Rory and many others.....Sandy Lyle at +19 makes a mockery of former champions getting lifetime exemptions. What's the point of him being there more than 30 shots off the lead? It's a bit like Martina Navratilova and John McEnroe getting an invite to play at Wimbledon just because they won it many years ago when they were good.
If Lyle wasn't there, or Larry Mize for that matter, then they could invite two others who might actually compete.
Having past champions play for ever more is either part if the charm or an embarrassment/weakness of the tournament. Take your pick as to your view.