Jason.H
Well-known member
Custom fit Ping you can have 2 degree strong, normal or retro (weaker) on some irons. Don’t get hung up on the numbers as long as your bag set is well gapped is most important.
Wow!!!Titleist T400 PW has a 38 degree loft so 44 degrees is old hat now.
Titleist T400 PW has a 38 degree loft so 44 degrees is old hat now.
Found this on the Titleist website
View attachment 44227
That 5-W3 set is close to an exact match to one of my sets that is numbered 2-10
I can't see why ... any of it, really.can’t see why they off and P and a W
The now defunct Ben Hogan Company tried this a few years ago. I guess it didn't work because they went back to numbers except for wedges. I think you're correct. Some players are more obsessed with how far they carry their shots than making par or better.
So bizarre that the lofts are identical to the T300s, just all shifted across one. Why not just number them the same then?Found this on the Titleist website
View attachment 44227
That 5-W3 set is close to an exact match to one of my sets that is numbered 2-10
Perhaps it is for people who want to hit a "6-iron" a good forum distance.So bizarre that the lofts are identical to the T300s, just all shifted across one. Why not just number them the same then?
So it was a 9i? Not a wedge then? Most sets seem to just be same with the numbers moved along a couple of clubs...As newer clubs launch higher, lofts get stronger to bring the flight down meaning distance gets longer. It’s not false advertising.
I hit a cobra forged tech wedge the other week, the shaft was the same length as my current wedge, the flight was the same (ish by eye) but it was 15 yards longer. I checked the spec and the loft was pretty much my 9i, but if it hadn’t had a stronger loft the apex would have been stupid.
So it was a 9i? Not a wedge then? Most sets seem to just be same with the numbers moved along a couple of clubs...
But when we've established that the lofts are nonsense, how are you quantifying a "9i flight"?If the flight is the same, the shaft length is the same then you could argue it’s a strong wedge. Me personally I would have expected a 9i flight and not a wedge flight if I were to class it as a 9i.
But when we've established that the lofts are nonsense, how are you quantifying a "9i flight"?
I’d quantify a 9i flight as one that is lower wedge.