LIV Golf

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,640
Visit site
You can't even agree with yourself, let alone anyone else on the forum. What's the difference between "generating cash" which you say that LIV are already doing and "making money" which you "KNOW they aren't" doing?

I buy 12 eggs for ten pence each.

I keep 7 eggs to hatch as chickens.

I sell 5 of those eggs for 20 pence.

The eggs are currently generating cash, but they are not making money.

Comprende?
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
"Earlier in January, McIlroy said he would be open to play in a LIV Golf-backed tournament if the controversial tour became more like cricket's Indian Premier League - a softened stance that LIV chief executive Greg Norman said was a "significant turning point" for the sport."


I mean, he's made the biggest U turn going.

We all know why, he's been thrown under the bus by Monohan after his massive U turn and the merger stuff has all come out. He needs to save face and I do not think its his fault

The key part is “if it changed to a different format” and worked alongside the other tours - he expanded a bit more on the full length interview

Having some events bookmarking the tours , with all the big players backed by PIF - so before the season started ( around now ) you have 2 or 3 big events and then after The Open or Fed Ex that’s when there is a bunch of more big events with all the players
 

Bdill93

Undisputed King of FOMO
Joined
Jun 18, 2020
Messages
5,527
Visit site
The key part is “if it changed to a different format” and worked alongside the other tours - he expanded a bit more on the full length interview

Having some events bookmarking the tours , with all the big players backed by PIF - so before the season started ( around now ) you have 2 or 3 big events and then after The Open or Fed Ex that’s when there is a bunch of more big events with all the players

But they are working towards working with other tours.

They don't need to change the format if it becomes a wrap around event to the PGAT schedule. It'll just be different golf but the lack of WR points would be irrelevant.

He's been smart saying what he's said but we all know why and its because the take over is inevitable. I'm sure he'd be standing firmer still (like he was before) has Jay not thrown him under a bus and began the merger.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
So you agree with me then because that's exactly what I said. :rolleyes: Arguing for the sake of arguing.

🤦‍♂️

I know it’s hard for you to understand so I’ll try and make it a bit clearer

You just post blanket statements without little detail and then call him a hypocrite - you lack the details of what he is saying

His view on the current LIV product hasn’t changed , he still hates “with a blind passion” ( as you said) - that view has not changed , it’s still the same

What has changed is his view on how the players who left are treated etc

Look beyond a headline
 

HomerJSimpson

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
73,205
Location
Bracknell - Berkshire
Visit site
🤦‍♂️

I know it’s hard for you to understand so I’ll try and make it a bit clearer

You just post blanket statements without little detail and then call him a hypocrite - you lack the details of what he is saying

His view on the current LIV product hasn’t changed , he still hates “with a blind passion” ( as you said) - that view has not changed , it’s still the same

What has changed is his view on how the players who left are treated etc

Look beyond a headline
He was also adamant at the start of LIV that players have made their beds and and they shouldn't be allowed to play unless they turn their back on the tour and paid the fines. His view on how players are treated is a clear U-turn on that original stance
 

Orikoru

Tour Winner
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
27,519
Location
Watford
Visit site
🤦‍♂️

I know it’s hard for you to understand so I’ll try and make it a bit clearer

You just post blanket statements without little detail and then call him a hypocrite - you lack the details of what he is saying

His view on the current LIV product hasn’t changed , he still hates “with a blind passion” ( as you said) - that view has not changed , it’s still the same

What has changed is his view on how the players who left are treated etc

Look beyond a headline
Exactly - you're still arguing but agreeing with the crux of what I said.

Some ex-Ryder players go and Rory says sod 'em, they should be fined and not allowed back.

John Rahm goes and suddenly it's "oh no, we can't play the RC without John, we should let them back in."

Hypocrite, simple as.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
But they are working towards working with other tours.

They don't need to change the format if it becomes a wrap around event to the PGAT schedule. It'll just be different golf but the lack of WR points would be irrelevant.

He's been smart saying what he's said but we all know why and its because the take over is inevitable. I'm sure he'd be standing firmer still (like he was before) has Jay not thrown him under a bus and began the merger.

I’m not sure what working is going on tbh

There has been lost of talk but nothing from the people that matter - it seems the deal that’s currently being made is with US companies , I don’t think Saudi will be allowed to own the PGAT

If there was going to be some joining etc then LIV wouldn’t be trying to grab more players

I think the whole thing is a mess , and it’s going to be a mess for a while

It wouldn’t surprise me if in 12 months we are in the same position as right now - the people that are suffering are the fans at the end of the day , the golfers are getting richer ( some very rich ) but the whole golf tour product is diluted now

I don’t see LIV events in their current format being tagged onto the PGAT just so they get points and media deals - how do the players move between the two , do they only allow the LIV players to play on LIV events etc - it’s just a mess
 

Slab

Occasional Tour Caddy
Joined
Nov 20, 2011
Messages
11,672
Location
Port Louis
Visit site
"I was maybe a little judgmental of the guys who went to LIV Golf at the start, and I think it was a bit of a mistake on my part because I now realize that not everyone is in my position or in Tiger Woods’ position," McIlroy said. "We all turn professional to make a living playing the sports that we do, and I think that’s what I realized over the last two years. I can’t judge people for making that decision, so if I regret anything, it was probably being too judgmental at the start."

Rory 4 weeks ago
(edit to change from 2 weeks to 4 weeks)
 
Last edited:

mikejohnchapman

Challenge Tour Pro
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
2,004
Location
Dorset
Visit site
Never like to get in the way of a good argument but one of the main things that hasn't been discussed is timing.

The idea that the team aspect of LIV (whatever format this is) will be shoehorned into PGA "off-season" and then the LIV players would basically have the summer off - unless they were major qualified seems a bit far fetched. Hence the IPL analogy might not work. Add to this the stated desire to "grow the game" and most of the LIV events will be moved to southern hemisphere venue over the winter.

Free membership of the DPWT for all LIV players might work but otherwise the precious PGA tour are going to have to give up some dates.
 

wjemather

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
3,838
Location
Bristol
Visit site
Rahm was very vocal about not liking the LIV , no amount of money would make him player etc etc etc
This just isn't true. Rahm was always very measured in his comments about LIV.

Hatton was also very clear recently that he won’t be going to LIV , fully committed to other tours etc etc
Nor is this. Confirming entry to tournaments is normal practice. For someone in Hatton's position, it's simply covering your bases; it certainly isn't demonstrating any kind of commitment to a tour.

Rory’s stance on LIV hasn’t changed - he still doesn’t like it etc etc - that hasn’t changed

His opinion on players coming back or playing together etc has changed

He has accepted that LIV is part of the golf world right now but his opinion of LIV itself hasn’t changed
You can't just separate his views on playing LIV as it is currently and claim his "stance on LIV hasn't changed". It very obviously has; massively so.
 

C7usk

Active member
Joined
Sep 21, 2021
Messages
300
Visit site
Rahm was very vocal about not liking the LIV , no amount of money would make him player etc etc etc


Hatton was also very clear recently that he won’t be going to LIV , fully committed to other tours etc etc




Rory’s stance on LIV hasn’t changed - he still doesn’t like it etc etc - that hasn’t changed

His opinion on players coming back or playing together etc has changed

He has accepted that LIV is part of the golf world right now but his opinion of LIV itself hasn’t changed
Totally agree Phil... People's opinions change. That's life..
Acceptance of the changing parameters and therfore changing your stance on things is surely better than just being stubborn and sticking to your original opinion...
Why Rory is getting it tight compared to others who have left to join LIV is madness...i hated the thought of LIV when it first started, but although I don't like the format etc I find myself mellowing...
I like that Rory wears his heart on his sleeve but is also willing to accept when he is wrong... If we all did that the world would maybe be a better place.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
This just isn't true. Rahm was always very measured in his comments about LIV.


Nor is this. Confirming entry to tournaments is normal practice. For someone in Hatton's position, it's simply covering your bases; it certainly isn't demonstrating any kind of commitment to a tour.


You can't just separate his views on playing LIV as it is currently and claim his "stance on LIV hasn't changed". It very obviously has; massively so.


Prior to his LIV switch, the Spaniard said in July: "I do believe that some punishment should be in order, but I don’t know what. That’s for the disciplinary board and other people that are paid to do that. My job is to hit the golf ball and try to do the best I can.



Rahm has also previously admitted that he can "see the appeal that other people see towards LIV Golf". Yet he's criticised the 54-hole format. "Shotgun three days to me is not a golf tournament, no cut," the Spaniard has admitted. "It's that simple."



When it comes to being hypocrites - Rahm is prob at the top of the tree


LIV is full of golfers that are hyprocites - players that declared loyality to other tours to then jump for the money and then go on about “loyalty , growing the game” etc etc
 

AussieKB

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
1,099
Location
Australia
Visit site
Totally agree Phil... People's opinions change. That's life..
Acceptance of the changing parameters and therfore changing your stance on things is surely better than just being stubborn and sticking to your original opinion...
Why Rory is getting it tight compared to others who have left to join LIV is madness...i hated the thought of LIV when it first started, but although I don't like the format etc I find myself mellowing...
I like that Rory wears his heart on his sleeve but is also willing to accept when he is wrong... If we all did that the world would maybe be a better place.
You should be a politician....
 

Fore Right

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2024
Messages
484
Visit site
Surely everyone is guessing as to what the new pro golf landscape/schedule is going to look like.
The negotiations are to try and structure a whole new schedule incorporating PGA Tour, LIV and DPWT and try and meet the needs of each tour.

Something has to give for that to happen.

From what I have read if the PGA Tour had sat down at the very start Liv would have been happy to sit outside the PGA Tour schedule and run their events through the off season.
Liv has bought itself leverage now with the players it has acquired so they are probably going to be wanting dates in the high season schedule.

Maybe the PGA Tour keeps their iconic now signature events and the likes of the Farmers and John Deeres have to be sacrificed to Liv Events as part of the NEW CO schedule ?
 

rksquire

Head Pro
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
841
Visit site
Rory's opinions have changed because of the $$$ - any criticism aimed at the original defectors should now, in fairness, be levelled at him, especially as he now knows what is coming down in the line in the next few weeks and months.

The PGAT and SSG deal is simply the gateway to greater Saudi riches and likely Federal approval (its not gone.... its just diluted?).

McIlroy is a smart man, for the all the criticism he will receive for backtracking, he knows his most recent and likely to be continued comments will ultimately make him even richer with him having a chunk of the pie. SSG is a collective, with a wide spread of investors, including FSG (Rory already has close links here for his own venture & Boston team) and Red Bird Capital (Rory already has close links here with F1), not to mention multiple other SSG investors who were already investing with McIlroy and Woods for the TGL venture. He probably stands to do quite well with the partnership, but given his links to the all the source(s) of the investment he's essentially no longer Monahan's puppet but SSGs.

The murky world of $$$. He has fingers in a lot of pies, he may be more confident about this years golf because he knows the plan, but he is no less pre-occupied. The decision to leave the policy board, softening stance, etc. are all calculated moves - and absolutely fair play to him, he won't need or miss any LIV signing bonus.
 
Top