sweaty sock
Hacker
Are you sure?
Couldn't have proven the point better.
Are you sure?
I am probably against LIV. Mainly, I dont care who runs the tours. So if LIV ran the show, I would be fine. pGAT runs it, fine. Boris Johnson runs it , well, almost.
The key is having all the worlds golfers competing against each other. Thats why the pgat has worked. Could Saudi have done the same? Probably. If they had ALL the player, and not a subset, and not a closed shop. That it has those limitations is what makes it a show circus, not sport.
Add it the 54 holes, the utter garbage of teams in an individual sport, and the shotgun, and they harm not help their case.
So LIV is THE problem. Not because of what it is in itself in the main, but because it has caused a split at the top of golf. We, the golf followers are the losers. Two half tours is only a fraction as good as one full tour.
I am probably against LIV. Mainly, I dont care who runs the tours. So if LIV ran the show, I would be fine. pGAT runs it, fine. Boris Johnson runs it , well, almost.
The key is having all the worlds golfers competing against each other. Thats why the pgat has worked. Could Saudi have done the same? Probably. If they had ALL the player, and not a subset, and not a closed shop. That it has those limitations is what makes it a show circus, not sport.
Add it the 54 holes, the utter garbage of teams in an individual sport, and the shotgun, and they harm not help their case.
So LIV is THE problem. Not because of what it is in itself in the main, but because it has caused a split at the top of golf. We, the golf followers are the losers. Two half tours is only a fraction as good as one full tour.
I to have become a lurker on this thread, but I liked your post so much I thought I would add a little to it.I think there are clearly divided opinions on what is a very political topic. I think based on that I’m going to continue lurking on this thread but not comment, it seems any conflicting opinion is like trying to put a forest fire out with petrol… it get heated!
In summary of my views please of offend
, I think LIV is here whether it’s for the good of the sport or not. The PGA has done a great job al be it with ZERO competition, but if LIV attracts a different audience and grows the sport further it has to be a great outcome. Golf has stagnated and viewing has become boring, they are trying something new to try and revive what is generally a boring TV sport. Have they got it right first time.. no, but at least they seem to be trying something different. It’s evolution and the sport needs to evolve to remain current as like it or not the traditionalists are dying off, it’s exactly the reason sports companies make golf gear and we done play in corded trouser and buttoned shirts.
Do we agree with the source of the funds, probably not but as I’ve commented before to accept sponsorship money for the other tours from the same sources is hypocrisy of the highest order. By the same token we all buy goods which no doubt have links whether it be fuel for the cars etc etc, so I find it impossible for us to sit in our ivory towers whiter than white.
Their country has an appalling history and if their investment in pro sports forces change via global acknowledgement and educations of its past then it has to be a positive. I was pretty oblivious to its history until it caused outrage when F1 went there, now golf and no doubt other sports if I did some digging.
My “personal” opinion is that the US tour found it perfectly acceptable to pillage every high profile player they wanted from Europe with a clear conscience and are now playing the victim when the favour is returned. I find it even more amazing that the euro tours have sided with the US tour given the damage it done to their “ brand “ as “ brand damage “ seems to be a big headline argument, to me it’s no different. Imagine being a character witness in court for the man who’s just burgled your house? The DP / euro tours had the perfect opportunity to have LIV host the big money events, have access to some high profile (past it or not) players for their events and the bottled it.
Enjoy the disagreeing
HighHorseSocks over and out.
I to have become a lurker on this thread, but I liked your post so much I thought I would add a little to it.
My personal gripe from the off has been the hypocrisy of the PGA Tour hiding behind "blood money" when in fact it has always been about LIV doing to it what they have done to the DPWT. The other aspect that I find completely hypocritical is found in this answer by Norman to a question posed by the Palm Beach Post. Link Below.
Q: Your reaction to the players who have been outspoken against LIV?
A: Shame on (those) who create this firestorm of controversy when you look within their own system when they got 23 odd sponsors who do $40-plus billion dollars of business with Saudi Arabia. C'mon, seriously? If you're going to go down this path just be ready to accept you're going to get some stuff coming back your way. And it's not hard to find it.
https://eu.palmbeachpost.com/story/...our-firestorm-more-exclusive-q-a/10033337002/
Ok excluding the politics, the murdering, the name calling, hypocrisy allegations and so on, l look at it simply from a players work load perspective.
They will averagely spend 50% of their time away from home, flying here there and everywhere in order to compete on current non LIV tours. The average age of a player in their prime (let’s take rory/speith) both at an ages where they are having young families etc. they will miss 50% of their child’s younger years solely through work.
If you had the option to work less, earn the same or in some cases more and be available to spend time at sports days, parent evenings , and generally be a more involved husband and farther how many would actually knock it back.
On a golfing point of view, and I am sure that I am very much in a minority with a very wierd view on this, but I would actually like more of a division between where the top golfers play. Now, hear me out on this, I know that I am being a bit strange (and maybe totally wrong) but I seem to recall when I was much younger that the Europeans did not play in PGA tour events much and vice versa. So, when it came to the majors, it was this massive build up of the best in Europe taking on the best in America etc and those events jiust seemed special and you would cheer on any European doing well and actually felt investered enough to support someone. Again, not denegrating the majors now but the fiield is pretty much the smae as any of the bigger PGA tour events and feels less special as a result and I have lost that us vs them rivalry.
Again, may be wrong, may be being weird but I just see something special about how I rememeber majors used to be.
FTFY ?I thought it was a fair statement from Stenson’s legal team and I agreed with him to be honest. I don't see why playing LIV events should preclude him from being RC Captain, other than the suspensions which are borne out of pettiness and desperation.
Makes you wonder if they had a commitment to add x more players in July or something. I've said previously I thought they'd have more chance of 'signings' after August.Yes, it shows how they are really struggling to attract high level players. He ticks no box other then 'golfer'. Not an up and comer, not a current high ranker, not a major winner, not a Ryder cup hero, not a people favourite or 'character' (the likes of Beef would be a better low ranking recruit), not a regional spread, not a winner. Blandest of the bland. We can be certain he was on no original LIV hit list to defect.
Its the surest sign yet to me that the tide is turning toward PGAT coming out on top here.
I thought it was a fair statement from Stenson and I agreed with him to be honest. I don't see why playing LIV events should preclude him from being RC Captain, other than the suspensions which are borne out of pettiness and desperation.
He stated in his letter that LIV had agreed to allow him to fulfill all Ryder Cup contractual agreements.Can you really not see why the European Ryder Cup committee would not want their Captain to move away from the ET ?
Players make their choices and their membership will come with certain rules etc but the Captain of the Ryder Cup makes both contractually and morally commitments to the European Ryder Cup.
It’s clear moving to LIV meant that he couldn’t fulfill the contract obligations set out but morally they wouldn’t want their captain to be involved in all this
And it’s also suspensions borne out of protecting the tour and the membership.
He stated in his letter that LIV had agreed to allow him to fulfill all Ryder Cup contractual agreements.
Most of the European team play out in the US and play only a handful of tournaments on the ET (DPWT now of course). There is no reason why he and others could not do a combination of LIV and ET, the template has already been set.
Exactly this. The captain is always someone who's past their prime and often playing sparingly. I'm sure his intention would have been to retain European Tour membership and divide his time as you said, ensuring he had enough spare time for the captaincy duties.He stated in his letter that LIV had agreed to allow him to fulfill all Ryder Cup contractual agreements.
Most of the European team play out in the US and play only a handful of tournaments on the ET (DPWT now of course). There is no reason why he and others could not do a combination of LIV and ET, the template has already been set.
Makes you wonder if they had a commitment to add x more players in July or something. I've said previously I thought they'd have more chance of 'signings' after August.
Don't know how significant this is -
2022 3M SOF 113, winner 26 points
2021 3M SOF 222, winner 40 points
The purse looks higher in 2022
He stated in his letter that LIV had agreed to allow him to fulfill all Ryder Cup contractual agreements.
Most of the European team play out in the US and play only a handful of tournaments on the ET (DPWT now of course). There is no reason why he and others could not do a combination of LIV and ET, the template has already been set.
He stated in his letter that LIV had agreed to allow him to fulfill all Ryder Cup contractual agreements.
Most of the European team play out in the US and play only a handful of tournaments on the ET (DPWT now of course). There is no reason why he and others could not do a combination of LIV and ET, the template has already been set.
I'm sorry. I've given myself a slap and normal service can now be renewedWill you stop if with the sensible and unbiased views please ?