LIV Golf

Jigger

Club Champion
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
1,845
Visit site
Anyone got any views on the gender inequalities of prize money on the men and women’s tour? Now I’m by no means saying a low prize fund is equivalent to the women’s rights abuses in Saudi but both tours have done relatively nothing to level up the playing field between men and women.

All the issues are purely around the tour monopolisation being challenged and the tours feeling threatened.
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
Anyone got any views on the gender inequalities of prize money on the men and women’s tour? Now I’m by no means saying a low prize fund is equivalent to the women’s rights abuses in Saudi but both tours have done relatively nothing to level up the playing field between men and women.

All the issues are purely around the tour monopolisation being challenged and the tours feeling threatened.

A lot of the prize money is very much dependent on the level of sponsorship for the events

The LPGA and LET are seperate to the mens Tour and it’s up to those relevant tours to bring the sponsers in. Should the mens Tour subsidise the Ladies ?

All for levelling the prize money if the income is also the same level to ensure it’s all equal

The Ladies at one stage were very vocal about Saudi Arabia about how they treated Women - yet offered a big pile of cash that soon disappeared, they didn’t complain about being told they couldn’t wear shorts or skorts
 

Backsticks

Assistant Pro
Banned
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
3,852
Visit site
Anyone got any views on the gender inequalities of prize money on the men and women’s tour? Now I’m by no means saying a low prize fund is equivalent to the women’s rights abuses in Saudi but both tours have done relatively nothing to level up the playing field between men and women.

All the issues are purely around the tour monopolisation being challenged and the tours feeling threatened.
Yes, I would say its about right, so fine at the moment. Womens tour developping nicely.
They need to stop tricking around with their majors though, and limit themselves to 4.
 

BrianM

Head Pro
Moderator
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
5,564
Location
Inverness
Visit site
Anyone got any views on the gender inequalities of prize money on the men and women’s tour? Now I’m by no means saying a low prize fund is equivalent to the women’s rights abuses in Saudi but both tours have done relatively nothing to level up the playing field between men and women.

All the issues are purely around the tour monopolisation being challenged and the tours feeling threatened.

Saudi Aramco sponsor the Womens European tour, the same personnel who bank roll LIV, best not to speak about it ??
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
I’m not excusing anything. That interview I’ve posted pre dates his comment at Centurion, so how would he be backtracking?
if you watch it all, you’ll also hear Weir comment on how GN had reached out to Monahan, Pelley, and all the guys running the majors. The only one to respond were Augusta.

Are the majors supposed to respond to Norman ?

Why should they - he is the figure head for a golf entity that potentially they don’t want to have anything to do with - he is “buying” the players , buying a tour , buying fans - maybe that’s not what they want to see.
 

Jigger

Club Champion
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
1,845
Visit site
A lot of the prize money is very much dependent on the level of sponsorship for the events

The LPGA and LET are seperate to the mens Tour and it’s up to those relevant tours to bring the sponsers in. Should the mens Tour subsidise the Ladies ?

All for levelling the prize money if the income is also the same level to ensure it’s all equal

The Ladies at one stage were very vocal about Saudi Arabia about how they treated Women - yet offered a big pile of cash that soon disappeared, they didn’t complain about being told they couldn’t wear shorts or skorts

decent comment but there’s ways of getting male and female tours playing at the same events so that they are not being subsidised. I keep banging on about this but just as they have moved to suitable course for distance increases and courses have been built around that need, why is it so difficult for them to say right, we’re halving the mens field and playing on a course than can accomodate both male and female comps. We’re going to have 70 men and 70 women and a cut at 35 each, alternate male and female tees. We don’t get to see the journeymen at the back of the field anyway and nor are we bothered about them so why not freshen it up?
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
decent comment but there’s ways of getting male and female tours playing at the same events so that they are not being subsidised. I keep banging on about this but just as they have moved to suitable course for distance increases and courses have been built around that need, why is it so difficult for them to say right, we’re halving the mens field and playing on a course than can accomodate both male and female comps. We’re going to have 70 men and 70 women and a cut at 35 each, alternate male and female tees. We don’t get to see the journeymen at the back of the field anyway and nor are we bothered about them so why not freshen it up?

I agree it’s a decent idea but that’s 70 players missing out from either tour - what about all those players that have qualifed with a full Tour card ? Why should they miss out ?

But that would still be subsidised in some way because it would still be the mens game bringing in the sponserships

There have been a number of mixed events - Sweden did one , 6’s etc

But the set up within the game is reflective of the dynamics within the game right now

Equality is great but must be equal in all aspects
 
D

Deleted member 15344

Guest
And .....Jason Kokrak will, apparently, complete the line up......:sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep:

So what about all the rumours of Smith , Cantlay , Matsyuma ?‍♂️

In the end two mid level at best US players and a player they have got just to rock the boat and who is on the downward part of his career
 

PhilTheFragger

Provider of Entertainment for the Golfing Gods 🙄
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
15,424
Location
Aylesbury Bucks
Visit site
I know somebody who has met Pelley, amongst many others in the golfing world, and he said Pelley stood out as a very bad man.

Stepping in here, where do I start

Defamation is a thing
What you have quoted is a third party opinion dressed up as a fact,

I had a bloke in the back of the cab once and what he said must be gospel

Either quote your sources with examples or stop peddling tittle tattle
 
D

Deleted member 1147

Guest
Stepping in here, where do I start

Defamation is a thing
What you have quoted is a third party opinion dressed up as a fact,

I had a bloke in the back of the cab once and what he said must be gospel

Either quote your sources with examples or stop peddling tittle tattle
It’s not like his make believe & trolling is new
 

Mel Smooth

Hacker
Joined
May 4, 2017
Messages
4,659
Visit site
Stepping in here, where do I start

Defamation is a thing
What you have quoted is a third party opinion dressed up as a fact,

I had a bloke in the back of the cab once and what he said must be gospel

Either quote your sources with examples or stop peddling tittle tattle

Phil, the thread is full of baseless accusations, and you decide to pull me up on something??

I even had a poster accuse me of torturing my own son last week ffs, thankfully an admin spotted it, and gave the guy a ban.

I take it you’re going to apply this level of administration across the board now?

I don’t want to go down the avenue of reporting everything that I’m trying my best to be offended by, but I can, quite easily.
 
Top