Serious question for once. 
I suddenly thought, as I was 'analysing' my 9 holes of last night that I played pretty badly. BUT I was only 3 over my handicap. Ok, not big or clever, but nothing to be ashamed of either.
And then I took that thought 1 step further.
I did it without hitting any 'great' shots. I had a couple of 'lucky' shots ( EG the half thinned 3H on the 5th making it's way greenside ) a lot of 'poor but it's on the way' shots.
And 2 what I would call 'good' shots.
Now I'm a dodgy 18 handicapper that hasn't even played to that for a while, but I know that if I ever had to put my mind to it, and think my way round a course, I can still score ok ( by my standards, that is ).
But I'd have to do it whilst only hitting 4 or 5 good shots during the round.
That can't be right, can it ?

Is it the case that as handicaps fall, players hit more 'good' shots? Or does that just mean that the better players judge themselves more harshly, and set higher standards for themselves, so they don't count many more good shots per round?
Do the guys in the 20s hit fewer good shots, or do they hit more good shots, but even more bad shots to counter that?
Or am I just overly self critical, and in reality should lower my expectations and put down that half thinned effort as a good shot because it ended up in the right place?
If I'm right and normal, (?) it means that I play the game I love with a general expectation of playing to about 7% or 8% of the standard I would like to achieve.
Am I getting too deep now?

I suddenly thought, as I was 'analysing' my 9 holes of last night that I played pretty badly. BUT I was only 3 over my handicap. Ok, not big or clever, but nothing to be ashamed of either.
And then I took that thought 1 step further.
I did it without hitting any 'great' shots. I had a couple of 'lucky' shots ( EG the half thinned 3H on the 5th making it's way greenside ) a lot of 'poor but it's on the way' shots.
And 2 what I would call 'good' shots.
Now I'm a dodgy 18 handicapper that hasn't even played to that for a while, but I know that if I ever had to put my mind to it, and think my way round a course, I can still score ok ( by my standards, that is ).
But I'd have to do it whilst only hitting 4 or 5 good shots during the round.
That can't be right, can it ?


Is it the case that as handicaps fall, players hit more 'good' shots? Or does that just mean that the better players judge themselves more harshly, and set higher standards for themselves, so they don't count many more good shots per round?
Do the guys in the 20s hit fewer good shots, or do they hit more good shots, but even more bad shots to counter that?
Or am I just overly self critical, and in reality should lower my expectations and put down that half thinned effort as a good shot because it ended up in the right place?
If I'm right and normal, (?) it means that I play the game I love with a general expectation of playing to about 7% or 8% of the standard I would like to achieve.
Am I getting too deep now?