The GM office is no place for the faint-hearted when it comes to analysis of one another's games - things can get pretty brutal at times.
But no sooner had I sat down this morning than I was met with this swift appraisal of my game from Tappers and Paul O'H. "Your chipping and putting are probably 3 or 4-handicap standard, your driving is probably about that as well, but your iron-play and pitching we'd put at around 14."
The thing is, after a bit of bartering over their slightly harsh iron-play analysis (got them down to about 10-12!), they're probably not that far off, although ironically last Sat my iron-play was pretty sharp and my chipping well off the boil.
How would you - or perhaps how would your so-called friends - rate the various elements of your game relative to your overall handicap?
But no sooner had I sat down this morning than I was met with this swift appraisal of my game from Tappers and Paul O'H. "Your chipping and putting are probably 3 or 4-handicap standard, your driving is probably about that as well, but your iron-play and pitching we'd put at around 14."
The thing is, after a bit of bartering over their slightly harsh iron-play analysis (got them down to about 10-12!), they're probably not that far off, although ironically last Sat my iron-play was pretty sharp and my chipping well off the boil.
How would you - or perhaps how would your so-called friends - rate the various elements of your game relative to your overall handicap?