Neilds
Assistant Pro
There is an awful lot of guesswork in this thread
The key word was trend once you build a profile of scores it’s quite easy to determine whether GP rounds follow the same trends and patterns as competition scores, and flag up anomalies.What's a suspicious GP round though? I've shot 79 on a Friday afternoon then 97 the next morning before. Golf is hard and random things can ruin a score.
Thats a valid point however, for someone to attest your score that person must have a valid account with EG. You dont need to be a member of a club to set up an Iplay account.The definition of Marker in the rules precludes hardly anyone, though. You dont need to know any rules to be a marker. Just count to 10.
Indeed you don't. Took me about 45 seconds to create an iPlay account using a false ID.. Now I can self attest all those evening rounds that I play on my own and the authorities have given me the tools to do so.Thats a valid point however, for someone to attest your score that person must have a valid account with EG. You dont need to be a member of a club to set up an Iplay account.
Indeed you don't. Took me about 45 seconds to create an iPlay account using a false ID.. Now I can self attest all those evening rounds that I play on my own and the authorities have given me the tools to do so.
I support a lot about the WHS but do agree there are things that can be tweaked...but this sort of "enablement opportunity" is just staggering.
Indeed you don't. Took me about 45 seconds to create an iPlay account using a false ID.. Now I can self attest all those evening rounds that I play on my own and the authorities have given me the tools to do so.
I support a lot about the WHS but do agree there are things that can be tweaked...but this sort of "enablement opportunity" is just staggering.
Yes, it is wrong and open to abuse. EG need to go back to the old way of only being able to obtain a handicap is via a full club membership.Indeed you don't. Took me about 45 seconds to create an iPlay account using a false ID.. Now I can self attest all those evening rounds that I play on my own and the authorities have given me the tools to do so.
I support a lot about the WHS but do agree there are things that can be tweaked...but this sort of "enablement opportunity" is just staggering.
Yes, it is wrong and open to abuse. EG need to go back to the old way of only being able to obtain a handicap is via a full club membership.
Haven't investigated too much (hell I only found out about iPlay 2 or 3 hours ago) but on first glance it looks more of a function by which you can register your rounds and track your scoring...its very basic and if you want a bit more functionality and a valid handicap, then you need to pay for the iGolf functionality.....but I've already got a round registered in the iPlay system that I actually played last Sunday.If you can make an iplay account for free what's the point of the paid membership? Is it to have a handicap and you can just sign rounds in the free one?
The iPlay service doesn't give you a handicap...its just a score tracking service a far as I can tell that gives you an "average score".Why take the improved inclusiveness that it's given golf away?
It enables people who can't afford membership to go to certain courses than require handicap certs
The iPlay service doesn't give you a handicap...its just a score tracking service a far as I can tell that gives you an "average score".
Irrespective of whether you can manipulate your handicap quickly, or in such a fashion that the handicap committee might spot with a modicum of diligence, the fact is that EG have provided a tool by which anyone can circumvent a fundamental rule of handicapping....that your score needs to be attested....you don't even need collusion from a third party - you can do it all by yourself.That’s where an observant HC committee comes in
When running reports on ISV for HC changes it will stick out any who is having any sort of dramatic change and then the scores on EG checked
It would be very much a long game to have any meaningful changes
Improved inclusiveness? Dont be so dramatic. I've never heard of anyone being asked for a handicap cert or being refused a round of golf because they havent got one. Clubs are charging £500+ for a days golf, shall we stop that because some cant afford it?Why take the improved inclusiveness that it's given golf away?
It enables people who can't afford membership to go to certain courses than require handicap certs
I know...but we were discussing the iPlay app and what you can do with it and what auditable functionality might it provide....which is effectively zero. I could set my self up with half a dozen "mates" on iPlay and "play with a different person" each week...and administer the whole debacle from one mobile phone.Igolf (which a few of my mates have) is £40 a year and you get an official handicap.
Are scratch (or close) players really that interested in winning a monthly stableford??Perhaps those scr and 1 handicappers are trying to make a point. Certainly anyone in that bracket at my club has nothing left to play for.
What’s WHS got to do with it?All good but we have a problem in that it's now easier than it should be to cheat. WHS and other rule simplifications to blame. There probably aren't any more cheats but we've given them more opportunities.
Sounds like a great plan. Dumb down the whole sport, undermine the whole ethos of club membership, create a cheating template, just to make the sport more inclusiveWhy take the improved inclusiveness that it's given golf away?
It enables people who can't afford membership to go to certain courses than require handicap certs
What’s WHS got to do with it?
Why take the improved inclusiveness that it's given golf away?
It enables people who can't afford membership to go to certain courses than require handicap certs