Argument on course

Billysboots

Falling apart at the seams
Moderator
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
6,088
Visit site
Is it that long ?
how time flies.

It changed when the Rules Of Golf were published in either 2004 or 2006 as I recall. Certainly a long time ago, although for several years after that many clubs still had the no standing garb printed on their scorecards, even after new print runs.
 

Imurg

The Grinder Of Pars (Semi Crocked)
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
36,908
Location
Aylesbury Bucks
Visit site
It changed when the Rules Of Golf were published in either 2004 or 2006 as I recall. Certainly a long time ago, although for several years after that many clubs still had the no standing garb printed on their scorecards, even after new print runs.
I remember it well as I was at my 1st club and they had a sign saying singles had no standing right by the first tee . It was still there when the course closed in 2013.......
 

Steve Wilkes

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Messages
464
Visit site
Perhaps the older guys aren't aware that a single player on his own now has standing on the course.
And some single players know this and rudely uses this as you must let me through or I'm reporting you to the committee type of attitude.
Why not on approaching the group when you catch them up saying "Good Morning Gents, How's the round going", and after niceties say "I'm own my own may I play through, no problem if not, I can just skip ahead if it's a problem".
This attitude works much better all round in my experience, than what happened here
 

sjw

Well-known member
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
850
Visit site
I remember it well as I was at my 1st club and they had a sign saying singles had no standing right by the first tee . It was still there when the course closed in 2013.......
I played a course back in September that has a similar sign on the noticeboard by the first tee. I was playing solo...

Luckily, it was bucketing down and I think I had the course to myself.
 

Red devil

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2021
Messages
424
Visit site
I was in seeing the chairman this afternoon said I was more than happy to leave if nothing was getting done about the two slow golfers. Chairman said he will pull them in for a warning as they have already been told to let faster people through. Apparently just before I joined a email had been sent out to say about letting faster groups through as they have previously had complaints about the two old guys. I think he was as confused about there behaviour as I was he even said he had seen them play and agreed they are very slow.
So I would imagine from now on if I’m behind surly they will let me through?
Don't leave. They're the ones who need to address their behaviour, not you.
 

Oddsocks

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
16,729
Location
Croydon, Surrey
Visit site
I forgot to say these two guys get first tee time so there’s no one in front of them. I did try and get first time from BRS but it’s impossible.
They might be slow at golf but getting the first tee time there lightning fast

What’s to stop you rolling up 10 mins before and firing away?

While their poor etiquette is inexcusable, you made the same mistake 3 weeks running. Does the BRS not tell you the name of the people booked in so you know to either wait half hour or fire off 10 mins early.
 

clubchamp98

Journeyman Pro
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
16,299
Location
Liverpool
Visit site
What’s to stop you rolling up 10 mins before and firing away?

While their poor etiquette is inexcusable, you made the same mistake 3 weeks running. Does the BRS not tell you the name of the people booked in so you know to either wait half hour or fire off 10 mins early.
Some courses won’t let u tee off early. Green keepers working

Its a good reason not to have a booking system!
 

Crow

Crow Person
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
9,093
Location
Leicestershire
Visit site
In the R&A's "Spirit of the game" section under Priority on the Course it says:
Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, priority on the course is determined by a group’s pace of play.

So if a club's committee decide that it's correct for singles to have no standing on the course then that's their prerogative and singles will have no standing on that course.
There's no rule saying that singles have equal standing.
 

Captainron

Big Hitting, South African Sweary Person
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
6,358
Location
Rural Lincolnshire
Visit site
Who the heck plays on their own for fun? I get why you are so angry at the world with no mates 😘

But in all seriousness. Those two lads need to speed up and let you through.

And well done on your verbal restraint when “discussing” your difference of opinion. One little F bomb does not an argument make!
 

BiMGuy

LIV Bot, (But Not As Big As Mel) ?
Joined
Oct 9, 2020
Messages
6,589
Visit site
In the R&A's "Spirit of the game" section under Priority on the Course it says:
Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, priority on the course is determined by a group’s pace of play.

So if a club's committee decide that it's correct for singles to have no standing on the course then that's their prerogative and singles will have no standing on that course.
There's no rule saying that singles have equal standing.
Even if a club did have such a rule. You’d have to be some kind of 🔔 end to not let a single player through if there is space in front.
 

Slab

Occasional Tour Caddy
Joined
Nov 20, 2011
Messages
10,953
Location
Port Louis
Visit site
How many clubs make a rule to say single players have no standing on the course. Absolutely pathetic rule if any club runs with it.

How can you say that of 40,000 clubs, there none where the 'no standing' rule wouldn't be suitable

I get that for your club it might be nuts to have it but no way you copy/paste one clubs needs onto every other club/course
 

Swango1980

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
11,193
Location
Lincolnshire
Visit site
How can you say that of 40,000 clubs, there none where the 'no standing' rule wouldn't be suitable

I get that for your club it might be nuts to have it but no way you copy/paste one clubs needs onto every other club/course
I'm happy to hear an argument FOR such a rule. Perhaps I'm missing something, and there is an argument that would convince me it is a good rule to have.

But, I'm yet to hear such an argument. And so my current stance is that it is pathetic to state single player groups have no standing on a golf course. Etiquette is about politeness/courtesy to others. Treating individual players like they effectively don't exist doesn't seem very courteous. If I was at such a club, and in a 4-ball, I'd not feel too great keeping a single player waiting behind me, despite having a dodgy local rule allowing it.
 

rudebhoy

Q-School Graduate
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
4,531
Location
whitley bay
Visit site
In principle, you're obviously right (if indeed these 2 are as slow as explained), but for the future if they're the first ball and you're second, then surely you'd just trot through and start on the second hole instead?
Don't forget to give them a friendly wave as you pass them 😀
 

Slab

Occasional Tour Caddy
Joined
Nov 20, 2011
Messages
10,953
Location
Port Louis
Visit site
I'm happy to hear an argument FOR such a rule. Perhaps I'm missing something, and there is an argument that would convince me it is a good rule to have.

But, I'm yet to hear such an argument. And so my current stance is that it is pathetic to state single player groups have no standing on a golf course. Etiquette is about politeness/courtesy to others. Treating individual players like they effectively don't exist doesn't seem very courteous. If I was at such a club, and in a 4-ball, I'd not feel too great keeping a single player waiting behind me, despite having a dodgy local rule allowing it.

We should probably keep etiquette and standing separate. We likely agree that the general etiquette regardless of standing would be for a single/faster group to be let through

I don't necessarily agree that some clubs still have/need standing on the course but some clearly do and as its their course they are better placed than I to know if its needed or not.
I know of one local course to me where group size determines priority, being 4-3-2 with singles having no status at all but I've never asked for an official response why so I'd just be guessing

My guess would be its to do with field pace of play, the value of each tee time, with a bit of player harmony thrown in i.e they maximum revenue from each tee time, keep pace flowing from the larger 3 & 4 person groups that make up majority of players (so they aren't slowed by the clearly faster singles coming through) plus it eliminates the potential for arguments such as the one stated in the opening post


edit to add pic:
1701848227289.png


I suppose the other way clubs deal with it is to simply ban single groups. e.g I doubt you can play as a single at The Old Course. They'll pair you up or you don't play (& that'll happen at loads of courses)
That way the course swerves the issue of standing & status for a single player altogether by simply not having any. The question then is... is not permitting singles better or worse than allowing singles but with no standing?

Probably goes without saying but your average run of the mill members club likely doesn't have any reason to ban single groups or withhold their standing/status... but many other courses will
 
Last edited:

Crow

Crow Person
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
9,093
Location
Leicestershire
Visit site
I'm happy to hear an argument FOR such a rule. Perhaps I'm missing something, and there is an argument that would convince me it is a good rule to have.

But, I'm yet to hear such an argument. And so my current stance is that it is pathetic to state single player groups have no standing on a golf course. Etiquette is about politeness/courtesy to others. Treating individual players like they effectively don't exist doesn't seem very courteous. If I was at such a club, and in a 4-ball, I'd not feel too great keeping a single player waiting behind me, despite having a dodgy local rule allowing it.

A pay-and-play course might wish to discourage single players as they don't maximise revenue from a tee slot, which they'd sooner sell to three or four balls.
Such a rule might also grate on the three and four balls at said course as it delays their round having to let singles through.

A members club might see single players as not embracing the club ethos of socialising with other members, they're still happy for them to do their own thing but, as above, they don't want to annoy the members playing as groups by again delaying their rounds.

If the rule were in place it would stil be an option for the group in front as to whether or not they were going to let the single through.
 
Top