Tashyboy
Please don’t ask to see my tatts 👍
Another awful decision in favour of the big team.................
Am sure the big team didn’t get any VAR decisions yesterday. ?
Another awful decision in favour of the big team.................
Time wasting is only an issue when it’s happens against a team playing in Red ?Neither was the City match. Weird how they did that and not noticed it before. Looked like the chances were even between the sides and didn't even show the awful challenge on Grealish in the first half. Oh and the Southampton keeper time wasting from the 20th minute![]()
Am sure the big team didn’t get any VAR decisions yesterday. ?
In that case we don't need referees. let's have someone sitting in an office somewhere directing the game from there. If I was Mike Riley I'd be demoting Craig Pawson VAR and and our old Friend Kevin for that piece of total incompetent.If doing so is going to cost them there job or being demoted then theyre not going to are they, and thats clearly where were at sadly with them all towing the party line. If thats the case dont call them to the machine just make and own the decision upstairs
Amanda it’s got to a stage were I struggle to watch a game without VAR ruining it. And I certainly don’t just mean the City games.0 from 3 = seriously I never ever expect VAR to decide in our favour.
Amanda it’s got to a stage were I struggle to watch a game without VAR ruining it. And I certainly don’t just mean the City games.
That aside I thought Southampton were excellent yesterday. It just was not out day.
Do you think everything was correct with your goal, then?
The guy who scored was offside earlier in the move, and although the ball went to his mate, he still had a significant advantage as he had got a few yards clear of our defence for when he put it in.
Soft, soft pen. If Jota hadnt have taken one step towards the goalie which helped to instigate the contact, I would have said it was a pen, but that one step made it less of a pen to me, or no pen for me.
Well that’s an interesting decision ?
Nice dive by thiago Silva
The Liverpool goal was never offside in a million years. It doesn't matter if he tried to play it or not. If he had just stood there, you could still argue he "interferes" with play simply by being there, as he'd play on the mind of the defenders. But, it is irrelevant. He didn't touch the ball. Had he touched the ball, then it would have been offside.Our goal didn't have the player trying to play the ball (from what I saw), which rendered him not interfering with play, yours jumped trying to head it, so clearly interfering with play and therefore offside
The rule doesn’t say a player has to touch the ball:The Liverpool goal was never offside in a million years. It doesn't matter if he tried to play it or not. If he had just stood there, you could still argue he "interferes" with play simply by being there, as he'd play on the mind of the defenders. But, it is irrelevant. He didn't touch the ball. Had he touched the ball, then it would have been offside.
The only way it would be offside is if they rewrote the offside law. And then how would you define "try to play the ball"? A full jump? A full stretch of the leg? A half hearted stretch of the leg? Glancing at the ball and half a pace towards it but giving up?
I can't type too much at the moment as still not calmed down, but as soon as I saw Kevin Friend as the ref I knew we would be talking about decisions rather than football. It's a massive shame as it was a cracking game and some superb football from both sides. Liverpool are class, but that second half from us was simply brilliant.....until......arghhhhhhh!!!!
I can't type too much at the moment as still not calmed down, but as soon as I saw Kevin Friend as the ref I knew we would be talking about decisions rather than football. It's a massive shame as it was a cracking game and some superb football from both sides. Liverpool are class, but that second half from us was simply brilliant.....until......arghhhhhhh!!!!
The Liverpool goal was never offside in a million years. It doesn't matter if he tried to play it or not. If he had just stood there, you could still argue he "interferes" with play simply by being there, as he'd play on the mind of the defenders. But, it is irrelevant. He didn't touch the ball. Had he touched the ball, then it would have been offside.
The only way it would be offside is if they rewrote the offside law. And then how would you define "try to play the ball"? A full jump? A full stretch of the leg? A half hearted stretch of the leg? Glancing at the ball and half a pace towards it but giving up?
Would happily see Olise as a future Salah replacement
Sod off Phil! But you can buy Benteke back ??