PaulMdj
Well-known member
Prior to FSG yous were a basket case like everyone else.So spending rules were brought in with rugby - even then one club broke them to bring in all the best players and were caught
Was it 5 wins in 7 years before they were caught ?
Setting spending levels at the lowest punishes teams that have worked to build up their revenue - Liverpool don’t have a protected status , we have build the club up to increase the revenues , and it was down through good spending/selling and scouting
If the limit is put at the lowest then the players just leave en mass because clubs won’t be able to match the wages abroad
A limit on spending at the highest revenue means that everyone can spend the same - offer the same wages etc , if a clubs revenue isn’t as high as the top then their owner can fill the gap
That makes it a level field
The biggest difference and the one you don’t mention is, Profile, yous were and are one of the biggest Clubs in the World with a history to match.
FSG have been superb, but they took over a top, edtablished Club, a mid or low table Club has no chance of getting anywhere near yous without spending millions.
I don’t know, maybe new owners should be given a certain amount of time 3-5yrs to spend what they like before they have to comply with financial regulations.