No where near the cost if we don't.This ridiculous drive for net zero is starting to cost.
So much misinformation out there deterring people from buying. 100% they are not for everyone but plenty more can and should move to EV. I've had my Audi for over a year and can't fault it.From the article…
“Current rules state EVs must make up 22% of a carmaker's car sales, and 10% of van sales in 2024.
For every sale that pushes it outside the mandate, firms must pay a £15,000 fine.”
Utter madness, the product simply isn’t good enough yet so there isn’t the demand.
No where near the cost of we don't.
I'll have to assume this is a joke of some sort.What is the cost if we don’t
the world will endWhat is the cost if we don’t
Not at all - what is the cost to the UKI'll have to assume this is a joke of some sort.
Blimey - any clues on the decadethe world will end
Not at all - what is the cost to the UK
It’s costing trillions to reach it
But massive emitters like China and India are doing very little
So much misinformation out there deterring people from buying. 100% they are not for everyone but plenty more can and should move to EV. I've had my Audi for over a year and can't fault it.
Likewise India , making huge strides in renewables and lowering emissions. Also having quite a push on the EV frontAnyone who quotes china as "the problem" doesnt understand the issues. China are the world leaders in green energy, they have their own net zero targets which they are on course to meet (one decade later is the only difference) most of the world out sourced their emissions to china when they moved their industry there. Emissions per head is a lot lower than the USA .
China aren't problem.
What would help stellious more is building better cars. The build quality is so bad it's unreal
Maybe the locals were too busy at the football to focus on their work
Anyone who quotes china as "the problem" doesnt understand the issues. China are the world leaders in green energy, they have their own net zero targets which they are on course to meet (one decade later is the only difference) most of the world out sourced their emissions to china when they moved their industry there. Emissions per head is a lot lower than the USA .
China aren't problem.
Ofc it has. The world buys everything from china. Did you even read my post? The world outsourced it's emissions to china.
"
Myth 4. China is mostly responsible for climate change
Human-induced climate change is something that has been happening for many years and Western countries, like the UK, have played a big role in contributing to carbon emissions over the past 200 years. This means that only looking at who the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases are today is an oversimplification of a very nuanced topic.
A lot of the products we purchase in the UK are manufactured in China, meaning that we are essentially transferring a large portion of our emissions to the countries responsible for creating the products we use. Part of the reason emissions from highly industrialised countries are so high is because of the high demand for products created by them, from countries such as the UK.
Despite being one of the largest emitters of greenhouse gases today, in part because it’s such a big country, China’s emissions per person are less than other countries like the United States.
China is also currently investing heavily in renewable energy. The increase in investment has been in response to the rapid growth of green business, the demand for renewable energy and the need to clean up air pollution in its major cities. "
Myth buster: China and India’s carbon emissions | Friends of the Earth
We’ve heard it before, “have you seen the emission figures? Look at China and India, it’s all their fault!”. This is a myth that we’ll debunk by addressing some popular beliefs surrounding global emissions.friendsoftheearth.uk
Blaming china is typical whataboutary put out by climate change sceptics
Any idea when? I'm supposed to be playing golf on Sundaythe world will end