BTatHome
Tour Winner
Anyone have any idea on the RRP for the RBZ and R11s?
http://forums.golf-monthly.co.uk/sh...(RBZ)-and-R11s&p=467750&viewfull=1#post467750
Anyone have any idea on the RRP for the RBZ and R11s?
COR for this is .81 - only just short of the .83 limit. Most 3 woods are at around .75.. or thereabouts.
The only real problem I can see with this is distance gaps.
Assuming you can find a driver to outpace the RBZ 3 wood, you're going to need another club somewhere in the top of the bag to fill a huge distance gap
If your driver can go 280 and your 3 wood 260, you 5 wood 245 and your hybrid 230 but your 4 iron only goes 200 that's a big gap.........
If the RBZ 3 wood is going to be as easy to use and just as long/longer than a driver, then maybe the driver is dead...?
When your hitting you longest 4 clubs that distance, does it matter if you have a big gap to your 4i? With those distance off the tee you can reach any hole on the course despite the gap. The only time a big gap is a problem is if you're not hitting it that far. Think about it, if you can get within 200yds of every hole which you should do with the distances you mention a 30yd gap is not an issue.
There was some estimated prices in the mag last month think. R11s was £329 and RBZ driver £249 and fairway £199 but I am not 100% sure so if this is wrong apologies!
White is just fine - Give over....
Give it a Bash - Can't look down on it
Might surprise yourself - very much doubt it
Really look great at address - No it doesn't
It is the 'Slot' in the sole, apparently that is helping achieve distance gains in the RBZ fairway wood
If this same 'Sole slot' was incorporated in the matching RBZ driver, it would be deemed illegal, breaching the COR rating legal limit
That is the Story.........
I do Presuming it has been tested
I may be a bit dumb but not sure I get how this works. If the RBZ 3 wood technology is so great, why can it not be translated in to a driver that would, in turn, go 20 yards further than those on the market now. Is it because drivers have tighter limitations under the rules than are applied to 3 woods? If so, surely this is an easy way to bypass the regulations as drivers have pretty much gone as far as they can, work on using technology in 3 woods that is banned for drivers. Or is it because the RBZ technology just does not 'scale up' to drivers.
May just be me being stupid but I am just wondering why, if you have technology that allows a 3 wood to go as far as current drivers why the same theory cannot be applied to a driver to make that go even further.