Why are people A-Holes when playing MATCHPLAY?

Serious question though......in a matchplay situation is there any obligation to help look for your opponents' ball?

I know someone who had a favourite piece of tongue in cheek advice for matchplay league matches - if your opponents are looking for their ball in the wrong place, help them look in that exact spot!
I've always looked . I lost a final once when I found someones ball which was very lost.
 
Serious question though......in a matchplay situation is there any obligation to help look for your opponents' ball?

I know someone who had a favourite piece of tongue in cheek advice for matchplay league matches - if your opponents are looking for their ball in the wrong place, help them look in that exact spot!
No obligation in the Rules
 
my pet hate is people who have no clue on the rules yet insist on arguing the toss about them, even though they have n clue. i did play a guy at Nairn about 4 times in match play games, who was hard work. 1st time i played him, i was giving 10 shots and beat him quite easily, by the 13th. got drawn with him a couple of years later and his handicap was much higher, i was giving him 17 shots. i was getting over salmonella poisoning at the time and wasn't really fit to play, sweat was poring off me. but it was his i get a shot here on every hole but one started to grind on me after a while :ROFLMAO: he beat me that time, but i had the misfortune to get drawn twice more in matches
I had to give 17 shots in a match a few years ago. My opponent was really upset when we got to the stroke 18 hole and he realised that he wasn’t getting a shot.
 
Not as far as he is concerned. So we sit down and go thru each hole and after doing this twice, he admits I've won and just stands up and walks off. Never to be seen again.

A couple learnings for you about match play:
- there are no scorecards required
- once you have finished a hole and agree on the state of the match at that point, the state of the match cannot be changed after either of you play from the next tee.
I've fallen fowl to this before in doubles . After agreeing the score and leaving the green and on the nx tee the partner decided they had won the hole. We reluctantly changed the score as she had made it all so confusing.. we lost on the 18th .. lesson learned..
 
Serious question though......in a matchplay situation is there any obligation to help look for your opponents' ball?

I know someone who had a favourite piece of tongue in cheek advice for matchplay league matches - if your opponents are looking for their ball in the wrong place, help them look in that exact spot!
I got to a knockout final against someone who was known to have a hole in his pocket (my old club isn't come across very well in this thread is it!), as soon as it was clear he would be my opponent in the final I was advised by a number of members to follow him closely if he put a ball in the trees and had to go look for it which I did and won the match. So while I don't believe there's any obligation sometimes its beneficial.
 
Serious question though......in a matchplay situation is there any obligation to help look for your opponents' ball?

I know someone who had a favourite piece of tongue in cheek advice for matchplay league matches - if your opponents are looking for their ball in the wrong place, help them look in that exact spot!
No, but that doesn't mean you tell them outright that you won't be doing it! You do what most people do and just pretend to make a token effort. 😂
 
Wouldn’t hole 1 be the hole he didn’t get a shot on?

View attachment 58080
One of the travesties of the system. You give shots on the harder holes from stroke 1 and up, depending on the number of shots given. So the very holes that you really need a shot too (e.g. stroke 1) you don't get it. Having to par or birdie a stroke index 1 hole because your opponent gets a shot and you don't, is a hard challenge.

We have been canvassing our league (without success admittedly so far) to change to a system where everyone gets the shots they should, rather than the lowest HC playing off scratch. Would achieve the same difference, but mean the lower HC players would still get the shots they need.
 
One of the travesties of the system. You give shots on the harder holes from stroke 1 and up, depending on the number of shots given. So the very holes that you really need a shot too (e.g. stroke 1) you don't get it.

We have been canvassing our league (without success admittedly so far) to change to a system where everyone gets the shots they should, rather than the lowest HC playing off scratch.
But surely it's the very hardest holes that the worse player most likely needs to get a shot relative to the better player?
 
That was the theory- strokes were given on the hole(s) where the higher handicap player needed a stroke to get a half (tie). WHS has different recommendations, but not sure all clubs have implemented them.
 
But surely it's the very hardest holes that the worse player most likely needs to get a shot relative to the better player?
I agree, but its tough giving a higher HC player a shot on the holes where you would normally get/need a shot yourself. If it was played with both players getting all their shots, you would be giving shots on the easier holes, so (a) you might still have a chance of being competitive despite giving a shot and (b) the higher HC will have an advantage on holes where they stand a better chance of scoring lower.

I get the logic, there isn't an ideal solution in my view!
 
I agree, but its tough giving a higher HC player a shot on the holes where you would normally get/need a shot yourself. If it was played with both players getting all their shots, you would be giving shots on the easier holes, so (a) you might still have a chance of being competitive despite giving a shot and (b) the higher HC will have an advantage on holes where they stand a better chance of scoring lower.

I get the logic, there isn't an ideal solution in my view!
Ultimately, if you are only giving 1 or 2 shots, there may be very little between the golfers anyway. And, golfers don't play uniformly. An 18 handicapper, to me, isn't "expected" to bogey every hole. What I would expect is a handful of pars, perhaps even a birdie, but a handful of doubles or worse. Even single figure handicappers, I expect the odd double on their card, or worse.

So, even if a one handicapper would get a shot on SI 1 in Stableford, I'd still give the higher handicapper a shot on SI 1 because the probability is higher that they will get one of their doubles or worse on that hole.
 
Just read the OP and not the 5 pages of comments. Great write up by the OP by the way (y) it's inspired me to write up my recent knock out match on a different thread.

Anyway, my immediate reactions are:
1. Is this guy Australian?
2. Is he a cricketer?
 
I was in a similar situation where I was new to a club and trying to fit in....
so in the quarter final round of a matchplay knockout and I was off 14 at the time and him about 6. so kept getting snipes about my handicap....are you sure you're off 14, never seen a 14 handicap drive a ball like that....will be seeing the handicap sec when we get in etc etc....not 1 good shot mate or any of that so he was a total ahole.
I decided I really didn't want anything to do with this so after 12 holes I said look mate if you think im cheating with my handicap have the f...ing match....walked in and put his name up for the next round...
to this day I bitterly regret that decision and will have never done anything like it again...having said that I've not played anyone like that since.
 
Many years ago a couple of my friends were drawn in a matchplay event against a father & son. On the first tee their opponents announced that they did not intend to look for their opponents' balls, if lost. The game was played in a tense atmosphere.

My reaction would have been to say "if you're that desperate to win, help yourselves", walked off & reported them for unsporting conduct. I can't remember who won.

Yeah I’d definitely burst out laughing like others have mentioned.

Then I’d probably add that I will definitely be helping them look for their ball.
 
I was in a similar situation where I was new to a club and trying to fit in....
so in the quarter final round of a matchplay knockout and I was off 14 at the time and him about 6. so kept getting snipes about my handicap....are you sure you're off 14, never seen a 14 handicap drive a ball like that....will be seeing the handicap sec when we get in etc etc....not 1 good shot mate or any of that so he was a total ahole.
I decided I really didn't want anything to do with this so after 12 holes I said look mate if you think im cheating with my handicap have the f...ing match....walked in and put his name up for the next round...
to this day I bitterly regret that decision and will have never done anything like it again...having said that I've not played anyone like that since.
I would go the opposite way and start winding him up more. "Wow I don't normally putt this well!" or "Wow, and to think I tripled this hole last week, birdie today!" 😂
 
I agree, but its tough giving a higher HC player a shot on the holes where you would normally get/need a shot yourself. If it was played with both players getting all their shots, you would be giving shots on the easier holes, so (a) you might still have a chance of being competitive despite giving a shot and (b) the higher HC will have an advantage on holes where they stand a better chance of scoring lower.

I get the logic, there isn't an ideal solution in my view!
View it from the other perspective. The higher handicap player won't be getting shots where he usually does on however many holes is the difference between the handicaps.
Eg. HI 5 v HI 15. Higher guy will get shots on SI 1-10 but not on 11-15 where he is used to having one. That's 5 holes where the low guy has the advantage, cancelling out the perceived advantage of the high guy on SI 1-5.
 
View it from the other perspective. The higher handicap player won't be getting shots where he usually does on however many holes is the difference between the handicaps.
Eg. HI 5 v HI 15. Higher guy will get shots on SI 1-10 but not on 11-15 where he is used to having one. That's 5 holes where the low guy has the advantage, cancelling out the perceived advantage of the high guy on SI 1-5.
"where he is used to having one" He may get them in stroke play, but doesn't in match play - why is this perceived as a problem? Just play harder and hope for a little luck!
 
"where he is used to having one" He may get them in stroke play, but doesn't in match play - why is this perceived as a problem? Just play harder and hope for a little luck!
You're missing my point. I'm disagreeing that there's anything fundamentally unfair about matchplay between different handicaps.
 
Top