3offTheTee
Tour Rookie
Just asking, not querying. how is David Davies or white ever his name is a medical expert. I have seen him having his say in recent months.
Random Irritations
- Thread starter Blue in Munich
- Start date
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Blimey
Where were these panel of experts during the initial case ?
Believe they are investigating the case as part of an appeal maybe
D
Deleted member 35927
Guest
I think he's just championing her case for miscarriage of justice. I know there is a groundswell of talk she didn't do it but I've not really followed it in great detail.
Beezerk
Money List Winner
Probably, funded by the defence or totally independent? I expect they were investigating each individual death separately and not taking into account all the other evidence like all the deaths occurred on her watch, the letters like already mentioned.
SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
…thing is…on what basis and understanding did you and others thinking likewise form your opinion and become so sure…? Quite. We may think we are informed on such matters, but we are only as informed as those who wish us to form a specific view (and they will have a clear agenda) enable us to be.
We should understand by now in respect of views that we form and decisions that make, that we are only as informed or ill-informed on important matters as others want us to be.
Why we the public should only very rarely, if ever, be asked to decide on really important public life-changing matters.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Being honest I’m not sure , didn’t really read up much about it the first time because it would make my blood boil
Pin-seeker
Well-known member
There’s a documentary on iPlayer.
Watched it last week.
Personally I think she’s guilty,but several “experts” seem to think there’s a chance she’s not.
Just blows my mind how a nurse could do it.
Watched it last week.
Personally I think she’s guilty,but several “experts” seem to think there’s a chance she’s not.
Just blows my mind how a nurse could do it.
Beezerk
Money List Winner
She basically owned up to the crimes in a diary she wrote.
SwingsitlikeHogan
Major Champion
…I’d simply ask…have you seen the exact text as she wrote it, and have you seen the context preceding the diary entry? Maybe you have…I don’t recall that I have, though I have only taken a cursory interest in the case.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
I hope that’s not how they convicted her
Pin-seeker
Well-known member
Obviously not,but it didn’t do her any favours.I hope that’s not how they convicted her
The initial trial apparently had 145 days of evidence over a 10 month period. That's an awful lot of information as part of the bigger picture. The new claims are a part of the picture but there's a whole lot of other stuff to take into account as well.
upsidedown
Tour Winner
My wife has been in Neo-Natal for over 40 years and has no doubt of her guilt.
Swinglowandslow
Well-known member
Is that really the case, though?
Whenever the death penalty is discussed, so many seem to think that the debate is about those in favour of a death penalty expect ALL who are found guilty of murder to be executed
It doesn’t have to be like that. You could have a system whereby the Judge decides the sentence, which may be execution or anything else.
(Murders ; of course, range from the Southport murders, through to mercy killings)
The judge will have much much more information about the case than ever comes out in open court. He will also be experienced in whether the jury’s ( laypeople, as has been pointed out) verdict is 100 percent correct, or whether there is the faintest possibility it may be wrong..
This allows the cases where overwhelming evidence is present , and where there is no doubt,to be considered for execution e.g. Southport case.
I believe other Countries have similar set ups, 1st degree and 2nd degree murder etctt
jim8flog
Journeyman Pro
Sorry I wore it out and it was not even fit enough to be donated to a charity shop. Still got the red one if interested.Can someone please find the picture of the blue/gold dress so that we can have something else to argue about........
KenL
Tour Rookie
Is coincidence enough to convict someone? I thought proof was required?
Orikoru
Tour Winner
I don't get it. If they're saying there's a chance the babies weren't murdered, then how are they proposing they all died? Just gross incompetence??
I believe that is pretty much the defence. Systematic failures was the phrase I heard.
Fade and Die
Medal Winner
Natural causes and poor medical care they are claiming.
I always thought it odd though that her defence team never called any medical experts to refute the evidence.
Sid Rixon IV
Head Pro
No point. It's blue.Can someone please find the picture of the blue/gold dress so that we can have something else to argue about........
