How do you distinguish those with irrefutable proof from those found guilty after a trial, where ultimately it's based on weight of evidence? How do we gauge different levels of guilty?If there is irrefutable, 100% evidence then what's the problem?
How do you distinguish those with irrefutable proof from those found guilty after a trial, where ultimately it's based on weight of evidence? How do we gauge different levels of guilty?If there is irrefutable, 100% evidence then what's the problem?
How do you distinguish those with irrefutable proof from those found guilty after a trial, where ultimately it's based on weight of evidence? How do we gauge different levels of guilty?
Mostly motormouths sitting on bar stools, I'd guess. Mostly having ignored any opportunity throughout their adult lives to serve their community or country.I think you'd find a long line of people willing to do the job.
How do you distinguish those with irrefutable proof from those found guilty after a trial, where ultimately it's based on weight of evidence? How do we gauge different levels of guilty?
If society doesn't want to exterminate these items of human detritus then at least make incarceration as unpleasant as possible.How do you distinguish those with irrefutable proof from those found guilty after a trial, where ultimately it's based on weight of evidence? How do we gauge different levels of guilty?
Lucy Letby is an interesting case. Found guilty of terrible crimes, murdering babies, yet some people think she was innocent. Where does she fit in something like this?Mistakes have become rarer due to advances in DNA, mobile data, CCTV and digital banking etc. If you planned a crime well you had a very good chance of getting away with it back in the day, that's why we're seeing a lot of old cases being cracked from the 70's and 80's and even further back.
Labour are on about getting rid of jury trials in many cases to speed things up, which will be a disaster for justice.
1. Yes. I think Russia find state sanctioned murder simpler to operate than kangaroo courts and the death penalty.Two points on this map I'd like to comment on:
1. Apparently Russia has abolished the death penalty in practice. The people who made this map must be smoking something very strange if they believe the Russian state hasn't put people to death recently.
2. Interesting that Botswana has the death penalty. I was always under the impression that it's regarded as one of the most democratic and enlightened countries in Africa.

The institutional nature of prison, the knowledge you will never be free, never be outside the walls of a prison again, I think that is punishment. It will never make up for what this person did, never, but it isn't a cake walk.If society doesn't want to exterminate these items of human detritus then at least make incarceration as unpleasant as possible.
Nothing more than a concrete box, crudest of beds and 3 miniscule meals a day, always the same thing every day of every remaining day of their life.
In understand not wanting to make them martyrs to whatever crazy cause they think they are on, but lets at least make them suffer in existance for the remains of their life.
I think the only people who think that are her lawyers beause they are paid to.Lucy Letby is an interesting case. Found guilty of terrible crimes, murdering babies, yet some people think she was innocent. Where does she fit in something like this?
Lucy Letby is an interesting case. Found guilty of terrible crimes, murdering babies, yet some people think she was innocent. Where does she fit in something like this?
There are MPs who back her caseI think the only people who think that are her lawyers beause they are paid to.
Can you not pay in via the banking app? Thought that was fairly standard these days.Have a cheque to pay into Nationwide. Can't do it at the post office so will have to go to another town to pay it in. Could have asked for it to be paid in direct to the account but it was such a carrot sort out I just said send a cheque.
Can you not pay in via the banking app? Thought that was fairly standard these days.
By this I think you mean that the government is continuing to report on something that has been an on-going consideration for several decades by various Lord (or Lady) Chief Justices and senior judges no matter what party is in government.Mistakes have become rarer due to advances in DNA, mobile data, CCTV and digital banking etc. If you planned a crime well you had a very good chance of getting away with it back in the day, that's why we're seeing a lot of old cases being cracked from the 70's and 80's and even further back.
Labour are on about getting rid of jury trials in many cases to speed things up, which will be a disaster for justice.
Hypothetically, if ever was brought back, it would have to be something that was almost never actually used. Just as the ultimate deterrent. But then, if you're someone who murders people, perhaps you don't fear or respect death and it wouldn't be much of a deterrent at all?Death Penalty is like many things in life.
Folk base their decision on the obvious extreme cases. But the practicalities of the rest are left for someone else to manage.
Mind you, having the option on the table isn't a bad thing.
It exists in some US states yet they have high murder rates. Doesn't seem much of a deterrent there.Hypothetically, if ever was brought back, it would have to be something that was almost never actually used. Just as the ultimate deterrent. But then, if you're someone who murders people, perhaps you don't fear or respect death and it wouldn't be much of a deterrent at all?
Nope.Can you not pay in via the banking app? Thought that was fairly standard these days.