LIV Golf

I suppose the purpose of qualification isn't to get the Top x number of players in the world (x being the field size), as slots will be open to amateurs, PGA club pros, past champions, etc (criteria depending on the Major we are discussing of course)

So, I wouldn't be against the Top y players from LIV qualifying for Majors (would it be the same for each Major?). That qualification process can be reviewed over time depending on how much value they bring to the Majors

I agree. But one of the problems Liv faces right in this regard is that the ones that are playing the very best golf on Liv are not playing best golf in majors. So it becomes impossible to assess what that number should be, especially someone like Gooch who came 10th last year but barely teed it up outside of Liv.

Start very small (as some have done this year) and move from there, if needed.
 
So as nobody is talking about this weeks PGAT event, by default, is that a sideshow?
The Heritage is a Historic Event on a proper signature golf course.

Any event straight after The Masters is going to feel like "after the lords mayors show." no matter what it is.. with a lot of major players having a rest.
 
I’m talking specifically about the argument that play on Liv should lead directly to qualification in majors. Some arguing as high as Top 12 or all event winners

Current evidence shows that performance on Liv does not translate to equivalent major performance.

The same scrutiny should also apply to some of the lower ā€˜ranked’ PGAT events where winners get auto invites to Masters. I’m not sure they’re rooting up trees after a good few days in an opposite event field/autumn swing

Sample size remains small, and variance in golf is high, so it just shows the majors are doing the right thing by taking time and easing into it.
Similar could be said about PGA Tour players, so it's not really an argument that stands up to much scrutiny.

However, it's certainly easier to justify having winners of LIV events than it is winners of weak field PGA Tour events, for which major exemptions are being questioned by the media - Fred Ridley avoided directly answering the question when asked prior to the Masters. However, it's not just one-time winners of those lesser PGA Tour events who have made little impact in majors - it's simply a different kind of golf to the soft resort course buffets they face most weeks.

Offering exemptions to the top players on the LIV standings doesn't really change the Masters field much - just one of last season's top-8 weren't in the field this year (Oosthuizen).
And nor would tournament winner exemptions - only 4 tournament winners between Masters weren't there (Steele, Ortiz, Meronk, Leishman).
 
Last edited:
I've just gone onto a random topic generator. The topic that was given was:

Cotton

Get your debates ready :ROFLMAO:
Keeping it golf and discussion related, I can't help but wonder if there could be someone here who would try and argue that Henry Cotton wasn't world class because he never won a PGA Tour event and didn't record a top-10 finish in a US "major" (especially if he had been a LIV golfer).
 
Keeping it golf and discussion related, I can't help but wonder if there could be someone here who would try and argue that Henry Cotton wasn't world class because he never won a PGA Tour event and didn't record a top-10 finish in a US "major" (especially if he had been a LIV golfer).

He won three opens did he not ?

It’s an impressive stretch to attempt to make some sort of relevance to judgments about people who won zero majors
 
Last edited:
Similar could be said about PGA Tour players, so it's not really an argument that stands up to much scrutiny.

However, it's certainly easier to justify having winners of LIV events than it is winners of weak field PGA Tour events, for which major exemptions are being questioned by the media - Fred Ridley avoided directly answering the question when asked prior to the Masters. However, it's not just one-time winners of those lesser PGA Tour events who have made little impact in majors - it's simply a different kind of golf to the soft resort course buffets they face most weeks.

Offering exemptions to the top players on the LIV standings doesn't really change the Masters field much - just one of last season's top-8 weren't in the field this year (Oosthuizen).
And nor would tournament winner exemptions - only 4 tournament winners between Masters weren't there (Steele, Ortiz, Meronk, Leishman).

With your first retort being so far out of whack I debated whether to bother with the rest. The best of the PGAT have absolutely repeated that in majors.

But yes, I’ve already referenced that many of the one time winners on PGAT in weaker fields should rightly be scrutinised and, in my opinion, changed to an extent. It hasn’t adapted to the fact the PGAT is essentially 2 divisions now.

ā€˜Resort course buffets’ is the very definition of all but 2 stops on Liv. Easy set ups on easy courses is the Liv m.o - which is their prerogative as they seek to appeal and grow to a younger clip driven, highlight based audience.

Again, the very best performers on Liv haven’t translated that into major form. That is a problem for Liv. It will undoubtedly change at some point.
 
Again, the very best performers on Liv haven’t translated that into major form. That is a problem for Liv. It will undoubtedly change at some point.
In the past 2 seasons, the top 8 in the end of season standings on LIV have recorded 2 major wins and 11 other top-10s (plus two top-10s in the Olympics) during those seasons.
 
Oh dont use actual facts on this thread 🫣

Well it is very flexible - I’m guessing ā€œtop 8ā€ was used because it allowed BDC to be included last year.

But Matts point was highlighted the ā€œtopā€ performers- ie the ones at the very top of the standings each season haven’t performed in the majors in the year

So DJ , Gooch , Niemann and Rahm are the guys who have performed the best on LIV - but all 4 haven’t replicated that form in Majors

Now obviously you can go down the rankings and find the odd player who has done well in majors

There has been a lot of ā€œdemandsā€ from LIV fans to allow the likes of Gooch , Burmester etc to be allowed to enter into the majors based on their form on LIV - when its very flimsy that form in LIV would mean they would replicate in majors and therefore enhance the major

Which then goes back to Goochs statement of ā€œthe best players not playing in majorsā€ etc - when it’s very clear the very best do play in the majors
 
The who’s where on what rankings might have an element of credibility, from both sides of the argument, but the who’s where on rankings and does it equate to other tours has been going on for donkey’s years.

Did a star on the old Sunshine tour migrate comfortably onto the next level? Same with the Tartan, Challenge, Korn tours. And then the old argument of European tour rankings ā€˜v’ the PGA tour.

For all the ā€˜x’ hasn’t performed since he shifted tours, have a look at what they did before they switched. Some were already waning. Some, quite rightly, jumped for the wages. Some of the strugglers on the PGA tour that moved across will have been fearful of keeping their card, and maybe even sleeping in an RV…

Rahm hasn’t had the best of times but rather than leap at a conclusion that says LIV is to blame(maybe it is), a quick Look at other top performers who’ve fell off a cliff clearly shows it just happens. Maybe there’s issues at home - kid very ill, wife very unhappy being left stuck with the kids. Maybe he’s carrying an injury. Or maybe he’s done a Sandy Lyle, and lost it.

The ā€œthey split golfā€ is a poor argument really. How many regular European tour golfers can decide today to play on next week’s PGA tour comp? The games been fractured for donkey’s years. Hell, long before LIV there’s been arguments about who hasn’t had an invite to the Masters or US Open.

People are splitting hairs and manufacturing arguments… *shakes head ruefully and wanders off to the pub*
 
Top