D
Deleted member 21445
Guest
Apparently he’s not a bad player, got a solid short game, which we all know, is so important.
Err he is most reknowed for cheating on and off the golf course ? #trump
Apparently he’s not a bad player, got a solid short game, which we all know, is so important.
The world rankings are over a rolling two years and I could only see one top 15 player under 45 events. And that won't include things like the Zurich Classic.
I was poking around on the OGWR site (passing time in airport) and was surprised to see four events in the last two weeks were 54 hole events with ranking points ?
Admittedly lower ranked events. So maybe only the team element could be a factor in not awarding points in future?
The key words in this 2023 announcement for me are "Established Team Franchises" from previously just saying teams
That could be suggesting Liv has the blue chip company's lined up to sponsor the teams next year as reported with the likes of Adidas, Red Bull and AT&T?
I guess we won't find out the 48 players until after the Presidents Cup at the end of September.
That doesn't change the validity of my comment. Grow and improve? Probably. But for an org with a major PR thrust through Twitter etc, it should not be making obvious foulups as frequently as it does.Give me one organisation or sporting event that has his the road running and never got any better with experience.
2 events in ,what do people expect?
From the off many have slated Liv,said it wouldn’t take off etc.
Liv is here to stay,will get better and probably be the No1 golfing tour in the future.
It will grow and improve.
All the hypocrites will jump on the bandwagon and life will go on as normal.
Surely everyone can see this as a good thing, getting the youngsters involved ?
I don’t think 54 holes is the issue - maybe it’s the cuts ?
I'm not really following that, the OWGR have a set of algorithms based on the rankings in a field - not sure how relevant it is how the field was made up.For me and I suspect for the OWGR, the lack of any sort of published qualifying criteria is the real sticking point.
The technical issue is no problem at all. World Ranking Points could be distributed using the same mathematical process.I'm not really following that, the OWGR have a set of algorithms based on the rankings in a field - not sure how relevant it is how the field was made up.
I think they risk being seen as petty if the don't allow any points, and agree with LPhil that more likely they just find ways to keep the total points low and maybe only given to the top few singles scores.
Being an Invitational doesn't stop WR points being awarded.....but some sort of qualification process to get into the event would be needed.
All the Tours, bar LIV so far, have qualifying comps to get on tour in the first place. Then qualification for certain events depends on your World or Tour ranking.
At the moment, LIV is purely invitational so it's hard to see how ranking points can be offered.
They have qualification from 2024
it’s not really qualifying though is it - opening it up to 4 people each year and also making it impossible for some not to be on tour because of the amount of money they are paid still keeps it well within invite only for 99% of the players
When it all comes together you can see why there is a chance they won’t get ranking points
But if they do then the amount will be very small
I don’t see the majors offering up spots from LIV tour events
So in 12 months time anyone not exempt imo won’t be playing in the majors
Into individual events? Or simply into the circus.They have qualification from 2024
Its a 48 man field, only the top 24 from 2023 are guaranteed to be in the series in 2024. How many from the PGA Tour are guaranteed - is it 125, from a field at an event of 156 or so?
Despite what you think, GN and his legal team will have a very carefully prepared case to justify OWGR points.
Into individual events? Or simply into the circus.
Then why is it part of the OWGR rules, would be my first point. Secondly no qualification criteria means that players who are invited have access to points that others don't have.I'm not really following that, the OWGR have a set of algorithms based on the rankings in a field - not sure how relevant it is how the field was made up.
I think they risk being seen as petty if the don't allow any points, and agree with LPhil that more likely they just find ways to keep the total points low and maybe only given to the top few singles scores.
Sorry but is there not only 4 spots open from qualifying ?
With 4 being “relegated” but it can’t be one of the guys they pay to be there or someone they deem that they need to stay up.
And there are 125 full tour cards - anyone below 125 in the money list loses their full tour card and there are lots more available from the KF tour , ET tour qualifying.
Any player from any recognised tour can attempt to qualify for the PGA tour.
There is also qualifying at times during the week for people to get into events
Im sure GN will think one thing - but doesn’t mean the OWGR panel will agree with him