HampshireHog
Assistant Pro
In 4BBB I'd like to see the shots applied at 75% instead of 90%.
Maybe 'absolutely can not win' would be a little too strong a phrase, but why would a low hc enter a comp they have very little chance of winning?
We have 4 players at 2 or less, and to win 4 out of our last 7 comps they would have had to beat the course record by either 2 or 3 strokes.
They still enter comps, because they want to lower their handicaps to have even less chance of winning the next one.
This. It works both ways yet the arguments are always made from the high handicappers point of view. I have never entered a competition to win it - just try to play my best and hopefully get a cut (which as you say makes winning even less likely). Why not enter a comp for the challenge of the comp itself. Why not to put yourself against your peers and see how you fare. Why not to beat your last best score. Why not to see if you can beat the guy who you always just lose to...
All this talk of winning or if you can't don't bother competing....as I said in most other sports it is the norm yet they still have plenty of participation.
For all you saying that you dont enter the competition to win (or have a chance of winning) you do realise you are in the minority dont you? Not everyone enters to win but a large proportion certainly do
So your intention is to be competitive enough to win.I sort of see this. I resent it when playing in a mixed event if there is only one longest drive hole rather than separate male/female holes as it greatly reduces my chance of winning. Although if they picked a hole with the red tees 50 yards up the fairway there might be a few disgruntled men...
Not sure, but those that tend to agree are low handicappers who strive to improve, all the time knowing their chances of winning are getting slimmer.
Is competitive golf really important in terms of participation in the sport - perhaps it is in fact a complication/demand that many aren't interested in.