• We'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a Happy Holidays and a very Merry Christmas from all at Golf Monthly. Thank you for sharing your 2025 with us!

Handicap allowance in matchplay

Region 3.

I understand your arguement, but what happens when you have to give more than 7 shots. I'm a 25h/c you have got to give me 14 shots, but where? Would it be from 12 to 18 and then 1 to 7, I dont know.
 
One thing I'd like to change is where they get them.

In theory, if I play spot on to my handicap I'll bogey SI's 1 to 11.

In theory, a 15 h/c will bogey SI's 1 to 15.

I know that'll very rarely happen, but why don't I give the 15 h/c his shots on SI's 12 to 15, where I'm supposed to par and he's supposed to bogey?

We had a new format matchplay KO comp this year open to men and women.

The idea was that it was a played off full h/cap and on each hole the better nett score won the hole. This way, both players effectively get all their shots at the right places and the ladies could join in as well playing off their card.

Seemed a good format to me :)
 
Region 3.

I understand your arguement, but what happens when you have to give more than 7 shots. I'm a 25h/c you have got to give me 14 shots, but where? Would it be from 12 to 18 and then 1 to 7, I dont know.

Yep, 12 to 18 then 1 to 7, as 8 to 11 are where we should both make bogey.
On SI18 if it really is 18 because it's easy, I should make par more often than not, but you're expected to average bogey on it. Wouldn't it be fairer if you got a shot there?

I don't suppose it makes a lot of difference in the long run, I just thought it was a viable alternative.

If I play a 10hc I get a shot at the (in theory) most difficult hole. The hole both of us are least likely to make par on.
 
If I play a 10hc I get a shot at the (in theory) most difficult hole. The hole both of us are least likely to make par on.

Are you saying you should in fact get your shot on the SI 11 hole?

Just the thoughts of a meandering mind.

If the game panned out 'exactly' to handicap, SI 11 is where I would score 1 more than him, so why not receive my shot there instead of the hole where we're both as likely to make bogey.

Like I said, just a rambling thought, but I like the sound of it.
 
If I play a 10hc I get a shot at the (in theory) most difficult hole. The hole both of us are least likely to make par on.

Are you saying you should in fact get your shot on the SI 11 hole?

Just the thoughts of a meandering mind.

If the game panned out 'exactly' to handicap, SI 11 is where I would score 1 more than him, so why not receive my shot there instead of the hole where we're both as likely to make bogey.

Like I said, just a rambling thought, but I like the sound of it.

I like the way your mind rambles AND I agree with what you are saying, you should get your shot on the SI 11 hole...

however... (and this is my rambling mind)

If you get your shot on the 11th then you are technically getting your shot on an 'easier' hole which takes away the little advantage that a low h/capper would need to 'even things out a little'. eg: If I say I'm 5 shots better than you I wouldn't then expect to give you 5 shots on the 5 easiest holes would I?

So.... therefore you need to even it out a bit first, and this is the part where the whole 'it's easier for a high h/capper to shoot 10 under their h/cap than it is a low h/capper to do likewise' part comes into it...

firstly everyone gets 3/4 handicaps, this levels out the possibility of banditry.... THEN you let the high h/capper have his remaining shots on the holes where they are actually due!!

Example... a 10 h/capper plays a guy off 20.

Both are off 3/4 so that's now 8h/cap VS 15h/cap, and the 15/hcap will get his extra shots on SI 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 15 holes. Bingo! Everyone is happy.

I'd be MORE THAN HAPPY to play that format in matchplay every time I go out. I wouldn't feel like I will get stitched by the higher h/capper having one of those 'great days' but also feel like I'd be giving him shots where he technically 'needs' them and not just on the SI 1-7 holes.

I'll call it the 'JUSTONE' format in case anyone want to play it :D :D
 
Of course all this depends on the Stroke Index depicting difficulty of the hole - which according to the guidelines it shouldn't. They should be spread around so shots are given throughout the match and not in "lumps"
Unfortunately a lot of courses do allocate SI in order of difficulty but SI 1 shouldn't necessarily be the hardest hole and 18 shouldn't necessarily be the easiest.
 
Of course all this depends on the Stroke Index depicting difficulty of the hole - which according to the guidelines it shouldn't. They should be spread around so shots are given throughout the match and not in "lumps"
Unfortunately a lot of courses do allocate SI in order of difficulty but SI 1 shouldn't necessarily be the hardest hole and 18 shouldn't necessarily be the easiest.

Well you can't do much more than allocate the shots where the card says you should get them, regardless of how the particular course allocates their stroke indexes.

It would be quite funny (maybe even an excellent idea) if you said to someone...

"Off 3/4 handicaps you get 7 shots on me, which holes would you like them?" :D
 
Of course all this depends on the Stroke Index depicting difficulty of the hole - which according to the guidelines it shouldn't. They should be spread around so shots are given throughout the match and not in "lumps"
Unfortunately a lot of courses do allocate SI in order of difficulty but SI 1 shouldn't necessarily be the hardest hole and 18 shouldn't necessarily be the easiest.

Well you can't do much more than allocate the shots where the card says you should get them, regardless of how the particular course allocates their stroke indexes.

It would be quite funny (maybe even an excellent idea) if you said to someone...

"Off 3/4 handicaps you get 7 shots on me, which holes would you like them?" :D

I quite like the sound of that, to even out the disadvantage of losing 1/4 of your handicap?

We're onto something.. Bob, how do you file a patent? :D
 
I never did get the 3/4 argument, it always favoured the lower handicap. handicaps are set 'against the course', so have to be used/seen that way.
A(2) v B(18), diff = 16, so B plays off 12. He has given up 6 shots to the course, A has given 2. no wonder low 'cappers liked it!

should be simple if both play off their full handicap - forget the 'you get 7 strokes' nonsense, A gets his 7, B gets his 14.

of course it could be interesting if you can allocate where you take the shots - before the round. An 18 has to take 1 per hole; 17 and below can allocate theirs at not more than a shot a hole, and 19 and above can allocate their additional shots also at not more than a shot a hole.
 
"Off 3/4 handicaps you get 7 shots on me, which holes would you like them?" :D

Stroke indexes 1-3 and the four par 5's (if none of them fit into the aformentioned criteria) please
I'd love that.
I'd beat you every time

;)

You'd be better off taking your shots on the par 3's as you rarely hit them! :D
 
Top