robinthehood
Hacker
Anything more than a casual flick really.Yeah i'd definitely stop short of lining it up & doing a PSR on it
Anything more than a casual flick really.Yeah i'd definitely stop short of lining it up & doing a PSR on it
But if you're down by the driving range and you've got range balls all sitting there, the only way you'd get them back over the fence is by hitting a full lob wedge pretty much?Anything more than a casual flick really.
Or don't hit them 😉But if you're down by the driving range and you've got range balls all sitting there, the only way you'd get them back over the fence is by hitting a full lob wedge pretty much?
So tempting when they're just sat there though isn't it? Just waiting to be hit.Or don't hit them 😉
Anything more than a casual flick really.
If he came forward to deny it then surely he’s admitting he is the one that has been seen doing something so how can he then deny doing nothing. If he’s going to deny doing anything by coming forward now he’s admitting doing something wrong.
'hitting' it is still fine, which i think is a good bit more than 'flicking' it
edit: just looked it up to refresh my memory. hitting it is OK there's no description that it should only be flicked or one handed etc. I think its more about the intent of hitting it, if its as a courtesy to the course its fine (obviously not fine if the intent is to get a sneaky practice strike)
Huh?
Perhaps cheating did happen.
But a witness statement needs to be taken with caution.
So often what a person sees is not actually what is happening. This is potentially life changing for a member at a golf club, being accused of cheating. Losing friends, family, being outcasted.
Can the witness be 100%?
But if there is only 1 guy making the accusation and he defends himself by saying it didn't happen then he has signed for a correct scorecard.
The email from the club has already gave a guilty verdict all the guy can do now is either ignore it and put up with tongues wagging or go and say to the chairman "that didn't happen" and at that point you have a word v word battle.
The club should have never sent out the first email, you can't judge someone guilty without letting them defend themselves on the word of a single person, even if he is a filthy cheat.
What you did was fine. I would steer away from anything that looks like a proper shot.This is interesting. In my first ever round at a new club, playing for handicap, I flicked a ball back towards the driving range as I walked up the 1st fairway. It was a casual one handed flick, and my playing partners raced over and told me this constituted practicing on the course. Made me feel really welcome. Was this rubbish? It was over 10 years ago mind.
Oh brilliant, another cheating thread, best pop out to Tesco (other supermarkets are available) for some more popcorn.
If I kicked it, would I be guilty of practicing my leather wedge?What you did was fine. I would steer away from anything that looks like a proper shot.
Doesn't seem like this has been handled very well by the club.
If it had been me I would have asked the person to come to the club for a private meeting with 2 senior committee members. Tried to sound them out and get them to admit their actions, with a reasonably lenient punishment of a ban from competitions for a few months, or a suspended ban and telling them that nothing would be made public.
The catch all e-mail makes it far less likely they will get an admission out of him. Also fires up the rumour mill.
And as plenty of said, if he decides to play hard ball when confronted it becomes 1 persons word against another which doesn't result in any kind of outcome for the accuser, the accused or the club.