Hacker Khan
Yurt Dwelling, Yoghurt Knitter
Is your twitter feed just a relentless barrage of increasingly right wing commentators? Or do you just treat us to the edited highlights?
knowing James and having seen the occasional comment from him in the past.
It was simply a dig at those that join the protests simply as they've have nothing better to do.
On the actual topic at hand, anyone caught or proven to have acted unlawfully should face prosecution. All they've done is undermine the cause and given the media the opportunity to appeal to populism by diverting the news story instead of holding up a mirror to society and challenging why the protests are happening.
Ah great, you know him and he has a first name! Cant be an awful joke with racist undertones then. Glad you can clear up what he meant for him.
Having seen his later posts where he had the option of going 'hands up, badly worded attempt at humour' or double down and shout louder and having chose the latter, I'm not so sure I'd be so quick to rush to his defence in future.
Anyway I'm out on this, broke my rule not to read through divisive threads
On the actual topic at hand, anyone caught or proven to have acted unlawfully should face prosecution. All they've done is undermine the cause and given the media the opportunity to appeal to populism by diverting the news story instead of holding up a mirror to society and challenging why the protests are happening.
Ah great, you know him and he has a first name! Cant be an awful joke with racist undertones then. Glad you can clear up what he meant for him.
Having seen his later posts where he had the option of going 'hands up, badly worded attempt at humour' or double down and shout louder and having chose the latter, I'm not so sure I'd be so quick to rush to his defence in future.
Anyway I'm out on this, broke my rule not to read through divisive threads
On the actual topic at hand, anyone caught or proven to have acted unlawfully should face prosecution. All they've done is undermine the cause and given the media the opportunity to appeal to populism by diverting the news story instead of holding up a mirror to society and challenging why the protests are happening.
I support the cause - but in the current environment I feel the marches were inappropriate.
We desperately need the pandemic to be under control for health, NHS and economic reasons. There are very many people whose lives are on hold at the moment and heading into serious financial and personal circumstances - if not already there - because of the virtual closure of the service economy, food, hospitality, entertainment and leisure sectors.
And just so we all realise what living on Universal Credit and an element of furlough in a zero hours contact means - for this month my son has got just over £800 (UC + furlough) to cover ALL of his outgoings and to live. And his rent is £535 / month. He has about £275 for the month for all other bills, gas and electricity, and food. Try thinking about how you'd cope having to live on that - let's not think that those on UC and furlough are having it easy. He is desperate to get back to work but there is absolutely no way that that is going to happen whilst the infection rate measure remains anywhere close to 1. So in my eyes the BLM demonstrators are, in the current environment, irresponsible, and frankly, no more than deluded and selfish.
I don't even know what they are trying to achieve by demonstrating day after day. I just don't.
Just to compound things, by demonstrating repeatedly the marches give greater opportunity to those who simply wish to perpetrate violence and create chaos to do so. And of course we find today the pulling down of the statue (in other circumstances I might I'm not have been that bothered that it was pulled down - it should have been moved years ago) and violence against the police taking the headlines for the press - and giving the government opportunity to avoid talking about what they are trying to do in respect of the pandemic - what they need to be doing - and doing better. And not a lot about BLM and George Floyd.
I think more than that happened - chucked in the river and (sympolically) drowned?Ummm yes, he died 300 years ago
Shall we try and deselect him?
I support the cause - but in the current environment I feel the marches were inappropriate.
We desperately need the pandemic to be under control for health, NHS and economic reasons. There are very many people whose lives are on hold at the moment and heading into serious financial and personal difficulties - if not already there - because of the virtual closure of the service economy, food, hospitality, entertainment and leisure sectors.
And just so we all realise what living on Universal Credit and an element of furlough in a zero hours contact means - for this month my son has got just over £800 (UC + furlough) to cover ALL of his outgoings and to live. And his rent is £535 / month. He has about £275 for the month for all other bills, gas and electricity, and food. Try thinking about how you'd cope having to live on that - let's not think that those on UC and furlough are having it easy. He is desperate to get back to work but there is absolutely no way that that is going to happen whilst the infection rate measure remains anywhere close to 1. So in my eyes the BLM demonstrators are, in the current environment, irresponsible, and frankly, no more than deluded and selfish.
I don't even know what they are trying to achieve by demonstrating day after day. I just don't.
Just to compound things, by demonstrating repeatedly the marches give greater opportunity to those who simply wish to perpetrate violence and create chaos to do so. And of course we find today the pulling down of the statue (in other circumstances I might I'm not have been that bothered that it was pulled down - it should have been moved years ago) and violence against the police taking the headlines for the press - and giving the government opportunity to avoid talking about what they are trying to do in respect of the pandemic - what they need to be doing - and doing better. And not a lot about BLM and George Floyd.
You wanna change things? - get rid of this rotten government as soon as we have the opportunity.
Bristol was a major City before the slave trade. John Cabot sailed in the Mathew from Bristol in the 15th centuary funded by Bristol merchants and founded mainland America, the City was already a thriving centre for trade.I think more than that happened - chucked in the river and (sympolically) drowned?
I'm not normally in favour of removing such memorials (as, to me, it actually hides history) but happy to make an exception in this case. It doesn't alter the fact that Bristol became a major city because of its association with the slave trade and slave traders!
I support the cause - but in the current environment I feel the marches were inappropriate.
We desperately need the pandemic to be under control for health, NHS and economic reasons. There are very many people whose lives are on hold at the moment and heading into serious financial and personal difficulties - if not already there - because of the virtual closure of the service economy, food, hospitality, entertainment and leisure sectors.
And just so we all realise what living on Universal Credit and an element of furlough in a zero hours contact means - for this month my son has got just over £800 (UC + furlough) to cover ALL of his outgoings and to live. And his rent is £535 / month. He has about £275 for the month for all other bills, gas and electricity, and food. Try thinking about how you'd cope having to live on that - let's not think that those on UC and furlough are having it easy. He is desperate to get back to work but there is absolutely no way that that is going to happen whilst the infection rate measure remains anywhere close to 1. So in my eyes the BLM demonstrators are, in the current environment, irresponsible, and frankly, no more than deluded and selfish.
I don't even know what they are trying to achieve by demonstrating day after day. I just don't.
Just to compound things, by demonstrating repeatedly the marches give greater opportunity to those who simply wish to perpetrate violence and create chaos to do so. And of course we find today the pulling down of the statue (in other circumstances I might I'm not have been that bothered that it was pulled down - it should have been moved years ago) and violence against the police taking the headlines for the press - and giving the government opportunity to avoid talking about what they are trying to do in respect of the pandemic - what they need to be doing - and doing better. And not a lot about BLM and George Floyd.
You wanna change things? - get rid of this rotten government as soon as we have the opportunity.
I think more than that happened - chucked in the river and (sympolically) drowned?
I'm not normally in favour of removing such memorials (as, to me, it actually hides history) but happy to make an exception in this case. It doesn't alter the fact that Bristol became a major city because of its association with the slave trade and slave traders!
I think more than that happened - chucked in the river and (sympolically) drowned?
I'm not normally in favour of removing such memorials (as, to me, it actually hides history) but happy to make an exception in this case. It doesn't alter the fact that Bristol became a major city because of its association with the slave trade and slave traders!
Beyond racism.now, just thugs.
Now how would the French have dealt with this ?
Well it didn't actually become a city until mid 16th century, though it was a major port. But agreed, I should probably have stated 'source of major wealth'. Slave trading from Bristol actually started before Cabot/Caboto/Chabotto made his journey!Bristol was a major City before the slave trade. John Cabot sailed in the Mathew from Bristol in the 15th centuary funded by Bristol merchants and founded mainland America, the City was already a thriving centre for trade.
If the statue was to be removed that should be the job of the City council, not mob rule.
Notably with the exception of those of the notorious East India Company (and the less beneficial Ceylon and St Helena) that provide immense wealth for Britain!...
But in 1833 Britain used 40% of the Tresurey’s income to buy the freedom of all the slaves in the Empire....