Britain’s longest serving prisoner

Hobbit

Mordorator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Messages
20,207
Location
Espana
Visit site
Robert Maudsley has been in prison for 46 years, and if you then add the first 5 years which he spent in Broadmoor Psychiatric hospital he’s been incarcerated for 51 years. That is some stretch!

What has he done to earn such a long stretch? The short version is he’s murdered 4 people, all at different times, 3 of which were fellow prisoners. He’s actually spent 41 years in solitary confinement. But when you get down to the nuts and bolts of his story, it’s actually quite sad.

As a child he suffered prolonged sexual abuse. As soon as he could he ‘escaped’ to London where he worked as a prostitute. His first victim was a child abuser. His 3 subsequent victims have either been rapists, paedophiles and one had murdered his wife in a grotesque way.

A detective who specialises in interviewing serial killers found him to be an enigma. An intelligent, quietly spoken individual who was actually quite good to sit with talking about every day things. To quote the detective, “he’s never killed women or children, they’ve always been very bad people.”

Maudsley himself openly admits he should never be released, nor does he want to be. He recognises his early years have broken him.

He is in the right place but what a very sad story. Failed horrendously his parents and missed by social services and the schools he attended.
 
Very sad and outrageous he's kept in a glass box while terrorists are allowed to pour oil over prison guards and cut them up.

On a related topic, I see Micky Steele is finally being released. Another outrageous case of sheer spite to keep an 80 year old with dementia in jail just because he refused to confess.
 
Very sad and outrageous he's kept in a glass box while terrorists are allowed to pour oil over prison guards and cut them up.

On a related topic, I see Micky Steele is finally being released. Another outrageous case of sheer spite to keep an 80 year old with dementia in jail just because he refused to confess.

Why was he allowed near cooking oil when he is well known for assaulting prison officers

One of my colleagues is a former screw and knows the office who got burnt

Such a failing to even give him access to such things
 
Allowed?
Isn't Steele a convicted triple murder?
Is there a weirdest thread contest this weekend?

Allowed in the sense that a man who was found guilty of 22 murders and attacked prison guards inside, is allowed the freedom to access cooking oil and items (baking trays) to make blades to attack more prison guards.

Steele was found guilty of a triple murder but it's a very iffy conviction and relies on a supergrass and dodgy phone data from the mid 90's. The point is he served his minimum term and wasn't a threat considering his age and health issues.

Probably the weirdest thread this year 😅
 
Why was he allowed near cooking oil when he is well known for assaulting prison officers

One of my colleagues is a former screw and knows the office who got burnt

Such a failing to even give him access to such things
Did you mean a prison officer?

Terrible situation. This guy should have a whole life term and be in solitary for all of it.
 
I know it’s subjective, but I wonder how much it cost to keep him inside for that long. A length of rope would have been much cheaper.

Trouble is the death penalty is not just about one person, miscarriage of justice has been seen too many times.

When you look at the US, where they still have it in many states, the convicted stay in prison for many years before the death sentence is carried out.
 
Trouble is the death penalty is not just about one person, miscarriage of justice has been seen too many times.

When you look at the US, where they still have it in many states, the convicted stay in prison for many years before the death sentence is carried out.

Costs more to sentence someone to death than keep them in prison for life aswell with all the legal appeals etc, can't have any doubt at all. Plus then who does the dirty work? Not many could willingly take a life.. if they can they prob should be inside themselves. So many give the big talk they can but when it came to it their conscience would kick In
 
Really? So anyone employed by the nation in which they reside to carry out work deemed legal by that nation should be inside? Really? Why? Because you don’t agree with capital punishment?

Yes really Billy. If you willingly have no issue taking a life when your life isn't in danger. The persons strapped down and you press the button, pull the trigger, inject the needle then if it doesn't bother you in the slightest then yes there is something mentally unstable about you.

Its why many ex forces who kill even in the depths of war suffer from struggles of conscious

Luckily we live in a civilised country.
 
Yes really Billy. If you willingly have no issue taking a life when your life isn't in danger. The persons strapped down and you press the button, pull the trigger, inject the needle then if it doesn't bother you in the slightest then yes there is something mentally unstable about you.

Its why many ex forces who kill even in the depths of war suffer from struggles of conscious

Luckily we live in a civilised country.

Civilised? You clearly haven’t encountered any of the myriad of people out there who wouldn’t understand the meaning of the word, and for whom the death penalty is arguably entirely justified and appropriate.

Those who pull the lever, press the button or whatever are merely doing their jobs. It might be at the extreme end of the scale, but ultimately that is what it is.

I won’t name names but I have come across one or two truly frightening individuals in my time and, having seen the results of their handiwork, I can tell you without hesitation that the death penalty is absolutely what they deserve. They’re not human beings, and don’t deserve to be treated like one.

And if we lived in a nation which allowed the ultimate punishment, I for one would not accuse the individuals tasked with carrying out the work of the state as being mentally unstable. Far from it. I’d actually have a degree of respect for them for having the balls to do it.
 
Civilised? You clearly haven’t encountered any of the myriad of people out there who wouldn’t understand the meaning of the word, and for whom the death penalty is arguably entirely justified and appropriate.

Those who pull the lever, press the button or whatever are merely doing their jobs. It might be at the extreme end of the scale, but ultimately that is what it is.

I won’t name names but I have come across one or two truly frightening individuals in my time and, having seen the results of their handiwork, I can tell you without hesitation that the death penalty is absolutely what they deserve. They’re not human beings, and don’t deserve to be treated like one.

And if we lived in a nation which allowed the ultimate punishment, I for one would not accuse the individuals tasked with carrying out the work of the state as being mentally unstable. Far from it. I’d actually have a degree of respect for them for having the balls to do it.

You wouldn't get people with the balls to apply, you would get people who would use it to satisfy their own urges to take a life is the problem.

The only way that would work would be a committee of 5 buttons , you all press and nobody knows who actually did the final deed.
 
You wouldn't get people with the balls to apply, you would get people who would use it to satisfy their own urges to take a life is the problem.

The only way that would work would be a committee of 5 buttons , you all press and nobody knows who actually did the final deed.

So you’ve suggested a solution which you believe would work. Are those five all mentally unstable and deserving of being locked up?
 
If you can't see the difference then I really can't be bothered billy.

Enjoy your Easter.

What do you mean, if I can’t see the difference?

Instead of having one individual unhinged enough to push the button and take a life, you have five. Every one of them has to be content to be the one responsible for the death of another, regardless of whether they know it was their act which resulted in it. So by your definition, every one of them is mentally unstable and should be locked up.

If you willingly have no issue taking a life when your life isn't in danger. The persons strapped down and you press the button, pull the trigger, inject the needle then if it doesn't bother you in the slightest then yes there is something mentally unstable about you.


With the greatest respect, Paul, it’s you who cannot see the difference.
 
You wouldn't get people with the balls to apply, you would get people who would use it to satisfy their own urges to take a life is the problem.

The only way that would work would be a committee of 5 buttons , you all press and nobody knows who actually did the final deed.
Crap,!
 
Top