Oddsocks
Ryder Cup Winner
Yesterday I was having a knock with a few old mates and noticed that one who regularly plays two three woods one cranked to about 13* and the other closer to 16* had a new driver in the bag. The convo goes back and forth and he’s basically found the new epic max really suits him over his old cobra, yada yada yada but in short he has one in order.
He was hitting it well so for him to have have a bat that suits it great, but I committed the biggest mistake known to golfers …. “ ere bill gos a quick wack “ ?
I was trying it more for the shaft than anything else but Jesus this thing goes. Now I’m under no illusion that it was solid strike so would go well do so I thought for comparison I would test the both when I hit an average drive with mine. Two hold forward and two drives off the tee and the epic was about 15 yards longer. Wasn’t enough for me to want to shell out close to £500 but one of the guys in the group says with that gain he’d buy one.
The debate got a bit awkward as he saw just the gain and not how it would impact his golf. Knowing his course and game pretty well it would mean him hitting one less club into each green, no p5’s would now become reachable, the longer p4’s still out of reach in winds or damp conditions. He swing isn’t the most text book having only had 3 lessons in 8 years since starting, my argument was that with a structured lesson course he would improve technique across his whole bag no doubt resulting in less club required for every shot but he just couldn’t get his head around it?
the heated part come from me explaining that in the last 6 months he has ranged between low 20’s to low 40’s points around his own track and the inconsistency of that level would not be cured by a £500 driver, however it wouldn’t surprise me if he goes for a fitting this week for a new driver.
So, why are we all blinded by distance gains?
He was hitting it well so for him to have have a bat that suits it great, but I committed the biggest mistake known to golfers …. “ ere bill gos a quick wack “ ?
I was trying it more for the shaft than anything else but Jesus this thing goes. Now I’m under no illusion that it was solid strike so would go well do so I thought for comparison I would test the both when I hit an average drive with mine. Two hold forward and two drives off the tee and the epic was about 15 yards longer. Wasn’t enough for me to want to shell out close to £500 but one of the guys in the group says with that gain he’d buy one.
The debate got a bit awkward as he saw just the gain and not how it would impact his golf. Knowing his course and game pretty well it would mean him hitting one less club into each green, no p5’s would now become reachable, the longer p4’s still out of reach in winds or damp conditions. He swing isn’t the most text book having only had 3 lessons in 8 years since starting, my argument was that with a structured lesson course he would improve technique across his whole bag no doubt resulting in less club required for every shot but he just couldn’t get his head around it?
the heated part come from me explaining that in the last 6 months he has ranged between low 20’s to low 40’s points around his own track and the inconsistency of that level would not be cured by a £500 driver, however it wouldn’t surprise me if he goes for a fitting this week for a new driver.
So, why are we all blinded by distance gains?