WHS doesn't work

D

Deleted member 30522

Guest
The may well be - I believe Dotgolf developed EG's App! By checking which style they are operating in invoke, or not, other modules for booking, attester checking etc. I'd expect that's what the SG version does to determine whether to invoke VMS or not! An obvious method to overcome the specific problem (having to have a 'Guest' member) would be to return to Club Systems software, but that obviously has a financial impact!
Yes both are dotgolf, hence their overt likeness, but what they are trying to do is very different. And everything on the SG App is linked to VMS. Cost is why clubs are putting up with the shambles, and why it's mostly small clubs who have adopted VMS, big clubs simply can't switch because SG haven't got their act together.
 
D

Deleted member 30522

Guest
That's one approach! SG's is another - that potentially saves small clubs loads of money! BB's club seems to have taken that option!
When SG first introduced VMS v1 in 2021 it was roundly applauded, finally clubs, especially small clubs, were going to see something for the astronomical fees clubs paid and it was seen as a new outlook and long overdue awareness of their shortcomings.
Then we got the implementation and couldn't believe how bad it was, and worse, the very clubs that were adopting the system, weren't consulted at all. Small clubs, especially 9 hole clubs have different requirements from big clubs with large memberships and visitor numbers. But the clubs doing a modicum of testing weren't those clubs, and nor did they seem to be any due diligence that those doing the testing had any experience or ability to undertake the task, certainly results would suggest they didn't

To repeat the failures with an entirely new package is beyond belief
 

IJames

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2023
Messages
211
Visit site
When SG first introduced VMS v1 in 2021 it was roundly applauded, finally clubs, especially small clubs, were going to see something for the astronomical fees clubs paid and it was seen as a new outlook and long overdue awareness of their shortcomings.
Then we got the implementation and couldn't believe how bad it was, and worse, the very clubs that were adopting the system, weren't consulted at all. Small clubs, especially 9 hole clubs have different requirements from big clubs with large memberships and visitor numbers. But the clubs doing a modicum of testing weren't those clubs, and nor did they seem to be any due diligence that those doing the testing had any experience or ability to undertake the task, certainly results would suggest they didn't

To repeat the failures with an entirely new package is beyond belief
Er...Who actually pays those 'fees'? My understanding is that it the players that pay it (about £15) albeit via club subscription payment! Oh and what are examples of those different requirements'? I'd have thought the requirements were pretty similar, just a omparitively bigger drag on smaller clubs!
 
Last edited:

Jimaroid

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
3,734
Location
Fife
Visit site
Er...Who actually pays 'fees'? My understanding is that it the players that pay it (about £15) albeit via club subscription payment!

We’re all paying for this mess in Scotland from our union fees and if we’re members of multiple clubs we pay multiple times.

BB is quite correct in his assessment and it’s one felt by members at small clubs local to me too.
 

wjemather

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
3,862
Location
Bristol
Visit site
Er...Who actually pays those 'fees'? My understanding is that it the players that pay it (about £15) albeit via club subscription payment!
Probably worth remembering that union affiliation fees get spent on a great deal more than just dotgolf software (branded VMS in Scotland), as they always have been.
 
Last edited:

IJames

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2023
Messages
211
Visit site
We’re all paying for this mess in Scotland from our union fees and if we’re members of multiple clubs we pay multiple times.

BB is quite correct in his assessment and it’s one felt by members at small clubs local to me too.
So it's the players that paid, pay, or will pay for it, occasionally multiple times, and clubs are just the gatherers of the fees? That rather clashes with BB's assertion wrt clubs paying 'astronomical fees' as they were merely the conduit for the payment by players and may not be paying any fee at all - though that's yet to be confirmed!
 
Last edited:

D-S

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
3,890
Location
Bristol
Visit site
We’re all paying for this mess in Scotland from our union fees and if we’re members of multiple clubs we pay multiple times.

BB is quite correct in his assessment and it’s one felt by members at small clubs local to me too.
Surely you only pay affiliation fees at just one club, even though you might be a member of more?
 

IJames

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2023
Messages
211
Visit site
Surely you only pay affiliation fees at just one club, even though you might be a member of more?
No! Process to check is deemed too cumbersome, so multiple fees if multiple clubs! Happens in other sports too, Tennis for example, at least when I was a member at 3 (local for with SWMBO, competition and midweek while working away - pre Golf; not all at full rate!)!
 

D-S

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
3,890
Location
Bristol
Visit site
No! Process to check is deemed too cumbersome, so multiple fees if multiple clubs! Happens in other sports too, Tennis for example, at least when I was a member at 3 (local for with SWMBO, competition and midweek while working away - pre Golf; not all at full rate!)!
I could be wrong but I always thought that in England you only pay affiliation fees once.
 

rulefan

Tour Winner
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
15,221
Visit site
That's one approach! SG's is another - that potentially saves small clubs loads of money! BB's club seems to have taken that option!
But it has no doubt so far cost SG oodles, which is of course ultimately paid for by all clubs in Scotland.

Edit: Rather belated as I forgot to press Save last night.
 

IJames

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2023
Messages
211
Visit site
But it has no doubt so far cost SG oodles, which is of course ultimately paid for by all clubs in Scotland.

Edit: Rather belated as I forgot to press Save last night.
Again!.....Clubs or Players! I believe it's the latter - certainly ultimately!
 
Last edited:

IJames

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2023
Messages
211
Visit site
I could be wrong but I always thought that in England you only pay affiliation fees once.
You've raised a doubt and it might have changed from when it was relevant to me! But it maekes no difference to the 'Who Pays' question!
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 30522

Guest
So it's the players that paid, pay, or will pay for it, occasionally multiple times, and clubs are just the gatherers of the fees? That rather clashes with BB's assertion wrt clubs paying 'astronomical fees' as they were merely the conduit for the payment by players and may not be paying any fee at all - though that's yet to be confirmed!
it accounts for more than 10% of our cheapest category members fees, that money could be put to far better use by the club itself, than handing over thousands annually to a body that gives back nothing. The club pays the fee based on membership numbers, no idea why you think some would be paying no fee at all, that simply isn't the case, members are not involved in the process, most don't even know that fee exists
 
D

Deleted member 30522

Guest
No! Process to check is deemed too cumbersome, so multiple fees if multiple clubs! Happens in other sports too, Tennis for example, at least when I was a member at 3 (local for with SWMBO, competition and midweek while working away - pre Golf; not all at full rate!)
Now that everyone has a CDH number, it would be a doddle for SG (or indeed clubs themselves) to declare exactly how many home members they have and only pay the SG annual sub for those members. Of course SG won't do that as it's them that will lose out and clubs that would benefit
 

IJames

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2023
Messages
211
Visit site
it accounts for more than 10% of our cheapest category members fees, that money could be put to far better use by the club itself, than handing over thousands annually to a body that gives back nothing. The club pays the fee based on membership numbers, no idea why you think some would be paying no fee at all, that simply isn't the case, members are not involved in the process, most don't even know that fee exists
Are you really saying that the club doesn't pass on the SG affiliation fee to members! That's either completely daft or it's included, but not separately, in the overall sub! Every club I've checked - including Scottish ones - has had the various elements separately listed! So I'd still argue that that it's the members that pay the levy and your view that it's the club that pays is simply a rubbish, biased one! Whether it's value for money - for the players - is a separate issue!
 

IJames

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2023
Messages
211
Visit site
Now that everyone has a CDH number, it would be a doddle for SG (or indeed clubs themselves) to declare exactly how many home members they have and only pay the SG annual sub for those members. Of course SG won't do that as it's them that will lose out and clubs that would benefit
You are still under the misconception that clubs are the customers for the levy! Thy are merely the agents fo collection! As a demo of the fallacy, which of a players 2 clubs would not need to pay the levy! The answer - whichever one the player designates as his or her 2nd club, thus not needing to pay the levy! Somewhere in your years of IT you should learnt the simple data analysis concept involved!
 

wjemather

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
3,862
Location
Bristol
Visit site
it accounts for more than 10% of our cheapest category members fees, that money could be put to far better use by the club itself, than handing over thousands annually to a body that gives back nothing. The club pays the fee based on membership numbers, no idea why you think some would be paying no fee at all, that simply isn't the case, members are not involved in the process, most don't even know that fee exists
This (mis)perception seems to be one of the reasons for Scottish Golf deferring the affiliation fee increase.
 

Jimaroid

Journeyman Pro
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
3,734
Location
Fife
Visit site
For the time I was involved, SG billed clubs once annually based on the number of members on a date in September.

In over ten years I’ve never seen union fees itemised on any of my membership renewals. All clubs I’ve seen locally took the position that “the club pays affiliation fees” and many members have no idea what the fees are or that they are being charged for each club where they have an active membership.

Other clubs may vary.
 
Top