D
Deleted Member 1156
Guest
Free slots at 10.20 and 12.21 if anyone fancies a knock?
I'll play but only if it's a non qualifier as I don't want to go up 0.2 over the 2 rounds!
Free slots at 10.20 and 12.21 if anyone fancies a knock?
When is Lyle, Langer, Mize and O'Meara et al going to give someone else a go? Selfish - I'm sure they can get a game there most any time if they want to play the course so why not step aside and give a young guy in worlds top 100 an opportunity in the tournament?:angry:
Justin Thomas |
Justin Rose |
Alex Noren |
Adam Scott |
Matt Kuchar |
Kevin Chappell |
When is Lyle, Langer, Mize and O'Meara et al going to give someone else a go? Selfish - I'm sure they can get a game there most any time if they want to play the course so why not step aside and give a young guy in worlds top 100 an opportunity in the tournament?:angry:
When is Lyle, Langer, Mize and O'Meara et al going to give someone else a go? Selfish - I'm sure they can get a game there most any time if they want to play the course so why not step aside and give a young guy in worlds top 100 an opportunity in the tournament?:angry:
"Because of the qualifications, the Masters' field does not have a set size. This is important because it means older players with lifetime invitations are not taking spots from somebody who may have a better chance to compete." Looks like it doesnt effect others getting in
Their place in the tournament has no bearing on others whatsoever.
Mize has made the cut in 3 of the last 4, Langer has 3 Top 25s in 5 years. Mark O'Meara is likely playing in his last. As for 'et al' then Freddie Couples has 6 top 20s in his last 7 efforts!
Many top 100 players havent anywhere near the recent record of those 'selfish' players...
Langer and Couples are two players which I would never rule out in the Masters. And apart from that, having all the older players compete is one of the things that makes the Masters so special, so no matter how good or bad they play, I really would not want to miss seeing them play. Plus, as has been mentioned, even if they decide not to play, it has no influence on the other invitations, so they are not taking anything away from younger players.
Langer and Couples are two players which I would never rule out in the Masters. And apart from that, having all the older players compete is one of the things that makes the Masters so special, so no matter how good or bad they play, I really would not want to miss seeing them play. Plus, as has been mentioned, even if they decide not to play, it has no influence on the other invitations, so they are not taking anything away from younger players.
Langer and Couples are two players which I would never rule out in the Masters. And apart from that, having all the older players compete is one of the things that makes the Masters so special, so no matter how good or bad they play, I really would not want to miss seeing them play. Plus, as has been mentioned, even if they decide not to play, it has no influence on the other invitations, so they are not taking anything away from younger players.
Agreed - no different to the likes of O'Meara, Daly, Hamilton, Cink and Duval playing in The Open every year.
and it allows tiger to play for the rest of his career.. if it wasn't for this we wouldn't be on the verge of the best masters in history
Correction......best Masters that YOU can remember. Anyway, a ball hasn't been hit yet, it could be a total washout if 1 player runs away with it.