Swango1980
Well-known member
That is quite often a cliched view often thrown out by commentators / pundits, which often frustrates me. I agree, that generally a keeper will look to position themselves to make it very difficult to get beaten at near post. And, maybe Pickford made a mistake last night, though I've not seen it so don't know.I’m not anti Pickford, but no goalkeeper should get beat at his near post. His body was leaning to his left anticipating the ball going in that direction, meaning he was off balance and unable to react properly.
Ryan Giggs so called wonder goal against Arsenal in the FA Cup didn’t reflect well on David Seamen. Seamen’s body shape was all wrong, he was falling backwards and was hunched down as the ball went in at the roof of the net.
Seamen should have stood tall.
But, if you go back and look at the best goalkeepers now, and the best keepers of all time, I bet all of them have been beaten at their near post on several occasions. Sometimes it may be an error, sometimes the shot was simply so powerful and accurate, there'd have been little they could do differently. I mean, they could simply stand at their near post and make it virtually impossible, but then they'd be much less effective at reacting to a shot across goal. So, all very well saying no keeper should be beaten at their near post, yet the reality suggests every keeper has been beaten at their near post (caveat that by saying I have not reviewed the conceded goals of every single goalkeeper, so it is an assumption on my part)