Don Barzini
Assistant Pro
Soon as the infamous Forest tweet went out he was condemning them for alleging corruption and saying it was “school boy” stuff. Then posts that yesterday. Giant hypocrite.
I get that Scousers worship him. But gobbing out your car window at a child isn’t “football” I’m afraid. It’s the actions of a disgusting thug. I detest him for that mainly, but he doesn’t endear himself to me with the crap that he spews forth out of his mouth or onto his Twitter page.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Don’t worship him and he was rightly condemned and punished for his spitting incident
And a club constantly crying about corruption is school boy stuff
It’s every week from Forest and its fans - it’s relentless at the moment
The tweet yesterday was nothing in the grand scheme of things
Don Barzini
Assistant Pro
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
He is an ex footballer commentator- why would he be “worshipped”
He was a great player for us , but not a big fan of him as a commentator
Great goal for Wolves - very well worked
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
That’s a lovely finish - not bad for a left sided defender
That’s two quality saves by Sa. More of the same needed in the second half I suspect.
Don Barzini
Assistant Pro
He is an ex footballer commentator- why would he be “worshipped”
Dunno. You’ll have to ask the guys that sit with you at Anfield.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Again they won’t worship what he says as a pundit or commentator- know plenty that think he isn’t great
PaulMdj
Well-known member
fixed it for you
Don Barzini
Assistant Pro
Plenty more that leap to his defence as soon as they see a bad word written about him on social media or an internet forum.
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Plenty more that leap to his defence as soon as they see a bad word written about him on social media or an internet forum.
Are there
why would you be so worried about that , that’s no different to any paid pundit or commentator They are paid to give their opinion - some of what he says I agree with some I don’t
Some will judge him based on what club he played for or past events
Back to the football, watching city play against anyone but a top 6 team is rarely interesting. Today is another of those. Wolves have parked the bus, 10 men back, play on the break 
. I don't blame them, most teams do it, but blimey it's dull.
Have a think Sky, pick your City games
. I don't blame them, most teams do it, but blimey it's dull.Have a think Sky, pick your City games
PJ87
Journeyman Pro
come on ref move it forward 10 yards into the box.. wont learn his lesson
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
Back to the football, watching city play against anyone but a top 6 team is rarely interesting. Today is another of those. Wolves have parked the bus, 10 men back, play on the break
Have a think Sky, pick your City games
It was a good first half and Wolves have still had plenty of chances but this is like most games against City when they are dominating possession- just waiting for the inevitable Haaland winner
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
and there it is -
But silva looks offside
Nah they won’t disallow this
Interesting to see about the tackle a few moves before
But silva looks offside
Nah they won’t disallow this
Interesting to see about the tackle a few moves before
Nice to see an on field referee stand by the original, and correct, decision. Sorry, I’m no City fan, but if that had been ruled out it would have been farcical.
Swango1980
Well-known member
Not sure why VAR recommended a review there?
PJ87
Journeyman Pro
its leaving it up to ref to decide if silva is interfering with play. we have seen it before I think it was wolves on the end of it again.. they scored a last min equalizer against us last year im sure it was them and it was disallowed as the ref deemed the player was interfering
good decision from the ref. no way was he in the keepers way
Arthur Wedge
Well-known member
guess Silva at first was interfering with the GK then moved away as the header came in which maybe why he was asked to go to the screen
we have seen them being disallowed before which comes down to consistency
we have seen them being disallowed before which comes down to consistency
