D
Deleted member 1740
Guest
I'm not saying replace him FOR £80m. If the replacement is £120m then that means only "spending" £40m rather than taking the full £120m hit when they inevitably have to replace him if/when he leaves for free.
If they were guaranteed (or even remotely in with a sniff) of CL football and some sort of meaningful income then, yeah I get it.
Absolutely he is a generational footballer and I don't think anyone is saying that he can/will be replaced like-for-like, I don't actually think any player can be like-for-like as they all have differing abilities and personalities. But they WILL have to replace him at some point. The conundrum is whether to generate income or not whilst he still has "value".
I understand your point, taking £80m now looks good on the balance sheet but will it have a detrimemtal affect on the team this season?
Or is Levy and Co hoping Kane and Spurs have a great start to the season and he signs a new contract?
The latter is a risk worth taking imo, lesser of the 2 evils.

