sjw
Well-known member
Kilworth Springs.
494 yards yellow
504 yards white
535 blue
(It's not the easiest hole on the course!)
View attachment 53664
It is downhill though, which takes a bit offThat's a beast to be S.I. 18
Kilworth Springs.
494 yards yellow
504 yards white
535 blue
(It's not the easiest hole on the course!)
View attachment 53664
It is downhill though, which takes a bit offThat's a beast to be S.I. 18
As far as I can remember, every course I've played has been split odd and even. We can have courses rated for 9 holes as well so I don't know if it's something to do with thatI do have a question about assigning stroke index numbers to holes.
Most courses in America put all of the odd number stroke designation holes on the first nine
and all of the even number stroke designation holes on the second none.
This means that the stroke designations are not EXACTLY assigned by the relative difficulty of the holes,
but rather by their relative difficulty on their own half of the course.
As we know, the vast majority of American courses are built as two nine hole courses with a front nine and a back nine.
The legendary UK links courses, in contrast, are built with nine holes going out and nine holes coming back in.
In this case, are the stroke holes still odd numbers on the first nine and even numbers on the second nine,
or are they strictly by relative difficulty regardless of order or location?
From what I've seen it's mostly done broadly on hole difficulty, but with some changes made to fit certain criteria, for example not having stroke 1 on the first or last hole. And as mentioned above, having all the odd numbers on one nine and even numbers the other nine, so that shots in match are spread evenly over front and back nines. So your hardest hole if it's not SI 1 will still likely be SI 2-6 or so. And "hardest hole" is obviously subjective anyway.I thought that SIs were set so that they were spread out rather than hole difficulty?
odds on the "out" nine, evens on the "in" nine
My course has even SIs on the front nine. Oddly enough, off the reds it's the other way round.odds on the "out" nine, evens on the "in" nine
There is always correlation between stroke index and difficulty though. Granted it's not wholly based on that but you can't ignore the fact that SI 1 is always a long or otherwise difficult hole, as are 2, 3 and/or 4 usually. SI 17 & 18 are nearly always short-ish holes, be it a wedge-length par 3 or a short par 5 as stated in this OP. To simply say 'SI is not based on difficulty' is disingenuous in my opinion.The stroke index was introduced to ensure an even distribution of shots in Match Play. This Index was designed that by dividing front and back 9's and whichever 9 was the most difficult was given the odd numbered index the other given the evens. There after no mention of difficulty in Match Play. This was done so as to allow starting from the 1st or 10th and in match play there should be no other starting points otherwise the even distribution of shots no longer applies. Once the odd and even halves were decided certain indexes were not allowed to be used on holes 1,9,10 & 18 so that in the event of a match going to extra holes or a play off this would minimise the advantage of someone receiving a stroke.
Why the R & A does not make the stroke index part of the rules I do not understand but it was designed for match play long before Stableford or other formats decided to use it.
If however you have played a course who allocate strokes on degree of difficulty then marking is significantly more difficult and may result in the match being over before a player has received some of their shots. Degree of difficulty is also something that will be affected by weather conditions, ability of participants and even time of day.
Why the R & A does not make the stroke index part of the rules I do not understand but it was designed for match play long before Stableford or other formats decided to use it.
If however you have played a course who allocate strokes on degree of difficulty then marking is significantly more difficult and may result in the match being over before a player has received some of their shots. Degree of difficulty is also something that will be affected by weather conditions, ability of participants and even time of day.
The stroke index was always part of the CONGU rules long before the WHS and not the R&A as it is part of handicapping and not the playing of the game.
Having played for over 45 years it was only changed to suit match play about 20 years ago at that time it was also recommended that clubs have two cards with different S.Is - one for match play and one for stableford.
I would add that as a club where the vast majority of golf played in swindles and club comps is stableford it is preferred to have SIs on difficulty, although personally I would prefer to see the 2 card system.
The difference was the same but it was not full handicap for singles match I seem to remember but even that I think was before the change to the SI recommendations. A player in singles got three quarters of their handicap and the difference was then worked out.That begs the question - how were the differences in handicaps in matchplay dealt with before then?
I don’t really care about SI, I judge the holes and what is easy and what is hard for me.
I understand it has to be there to make the match play stuff work.
Having played for over 45 years it was only changed to suit match play about 20 years ago at that time it was also recommended that clubs have two cards with different S.Is - one for match play and one for stableford.
I would add that as a club where the vast majority of golf played in swindles and club comps is stableford it is preferred to have SIs on difficulty, although personally I would prefer to see the 2 card system.
If you v’e got a 6ft cross hill downhill putt and it is for two points (dependent on the SI of the hole) then you may well play it differently than if it is for one point. If you don’t know where you get shots then course strategy will be different.What's the point in having SIs for stableford?
36 points = nett par. It doesn't matter how the shots are allocated (although I imagine it makes sense to spread the shots out across the 18 holes).
There isn't one if your Playing Handicap is 0.What's the point in having SIs for stableford?