KenL
Tour Rookie
To remove someone's citizenship is a political decision no?
To remove someone's citizenship is a political decision no?
To remove someone's citizenship is a political decision no?
For the sake of repeating again. You can go political if you want and join the other suspects on that. This is about what we think of the decision - right or wrong and why. We do not have to mention the government, ministers etc. So either post about the moral and legal issues and what you think of them, or about her, or Don't
Then it would of been better if those who posted their pov didn’t name call those who disagreed or had a jib at people who are just doing their job.For the sake of repeating again. You can go political if you want and join the other suspects on that. This is about what we think of the decision - right or wrong and why. We do not have to mention the government, ministers etc. So either post about the moral and legal issues and what you think of them, or about her, or Don't
It's been a cause celebre in the right wing media, pushed by a right wing populist government and posted on here by a right wing sympathetic poster. If SILH had posted the left wing equivalent all the posters thst are saying send her packing would be calling political agenda.
The comments about wasting tax payers money are political. There's been barrel loads of tax payers money wasted in the last 12 months but that's off limits.
Then it would of been better if those who posted their pov didn’t name call those who disagreed or had a jib at people who are just doing their job.
I totally agree this can be discussed non-politically, but both sides should consider how they post, most know were posters political allegiances lie.
The way this thread is going reminds me of the 'blasphemy' scene in Life of Brian........'It's political; it's not politcal' ???
Let's bring back Shamima AND political threads.........?
You don’t see it as you sit on the same side as them.There are only the choice few who have dragged politics into this and everyone else telling them to keep it out of this debate. There was no political angle or side to this thread and nor should there be one
You don’t see it as you sit on the same side as them.
I genuinely believe you do, you only have to follow the “likes” on here to see like minded people.I certainly don't
I genuinely believe you do, you only have to follow the “likes” on here to see like minded people.
I’m on about the like minded people to yourself who make comments that others on here see as political, you don’t see them as political posts as you think the same way as the poster.You make no sense. I was commenting on the people who are dragging politics into this, not the rest of us who are debating this issue with views for and against and having a broad range of unpolitical personal views
You don’t see it as you sit on the same side as them.
I’ve already said I don’t see it as political either, but some posters are immediately scrutinised over what they write as other posters previously are ignored.Who's them? People with hard beliefs in strong laws - does that make others weak on laws?
I don't see it as political at all. The issue is should she be allowed back to the UK. Why is that political? The original decision might have been political, AND quite frankly I'm not interested in that aspect of it. The question remains, should she be allowed back into the UK?
I haven't a clue who would choose what, bar a few outliers who have very strong beliefs.
I believe she should be allowed back, and should have her citizenship reinstated. Quite on what terms that should be I'll leave to the courts/authorities. She was a 15 year old kid who was groomed, and potentially a 21 year old woman who can be re-educated/un-brainwashed. Surely as a child let down by the education system, her parents and a society that can't get its house in order when it comes to stopping grooming she deserves better?
The revocation of her citizenship, bearing in mind Bangladeshi law, might be legal but I feel its immoral. I feel there's a process to go through, i.e. the courts, in terms of any illegal actions by her. Revocation of her citizenship abdicates the UK's moral responsibility to put a potential criminal through the courts.
You forgot to add " so there "Your version only applies if the parent holds Bangladeshi citizenship by acquisition, not by birth right. Your version is Jus Soli, not Jus Sanguinis.
I’ve already said I don’t see it as political either, but some posters are immediately scrutinised over what they write as other posters previously are ignored.
Dando tells us about “bed wetters” getting upset with a point he made, yet “bed wetters” is a term given to left wing do gooders, if she’s brought back (and I disagree) we must accept she should be given a fair trial and a fair defense, instead we get Cherie Blair mentioned, despite this having nothing to do with the subject.
Nobody, but nobody says a word about either comment being political and I see both comments coming from a right sided point of view.