Rugby Thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15344
  • Start date

Captainron

Big Hitting, South African Sweary Person
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
6,342
Location
Rural Lincolnshire
Visit site
Unbelievable that folk are calling for Owen Farrell to be dropped from the England team. England were terrible up front and the ball to the backs was often slow which gave the Scots loads of time to set up and defend. Conditions weren’t great either and Jones had a plan to put the Scottish back 3 under territorial pressure. Hardly the recipe for a flowing game.

He’s a guaranteed starter for the Lions tour.

I just don’t get it at all
 

MegaSteve

Tour Winner
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Messages
7,304
Location
In the slow lane...
Visit site
Unbelievable that folk are calling for Owen Farrell to be dropped from the England team. England were terrible up front and the ball to the backs was often slow which gave the Scots loads of time to set up and defend. Conditions weren’t great either and Jones had a plan to put the Scottish back 3 under territorial pressure. Hardly the recipe for a flowing game.

He’s a guaranteed starter for the Lions tour.

I just don’t get it at all


The phenomenon that is Itoje aside, the Saracens contingent were well below par... IMHO that is due to lack of 'match sharpness'... Not sure/convinced that be returned through training sessions alone...
 

Grizzly

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
677
Visit site
Unbelievable that folk are calling for Owen Farrell to be dropped from the England team. England were terrible up front and the ball to the backs was often slow which gave the Scots loads of time to set up and defend. Conditions weren’t great either and Jones had a plan to put the Scottish back 3 under territorial pressure. Hardly the recipe for a flowing game.

He’s a guaranteed starter for the Lions tour.

I just don’t get it at all

So, the case for him to be dropped - which, for the record, I am making as an intellectual argument rather than my own stated view (because I am unsure how I feel on the issue) - goes something like this...
1. Something is not working in England's game plan, and has not worked since they lost Scott Wiesmantel after the WC. There is a world of talent available, but too often the reliance on kicking for territory means that lots of it is wasted. Ollie Lawrence has four caps now, and has received four passes. Anthony Watson may not even have seen that many.
2. Whilst this is in part due to Eddie's game plan, the fact is that the fly half has to direct play, and should at the very minimum spot clear multi man overlaps. Farrell butchered three on Saturday, including one when Russell was in the bin. He did similar in the Autumn Nations Cup.
3. Sooner or later his own frustration at the state of his game is going to result in a red card - he could have been in the bin again on Saturday for tackling with his shoulder.
4. His kicking from the tee has been trending downward for two years now.
5. Sooner or later we need to see what some of the young guns can do - not just Ford, but Smith, Umaga, Joe Simmonds. Now is the time to blood them, and use Farrell either as an option at 12 or from the bench.

I think the major issue is that he can't be captain, kicker and 10. It isn't working. So either he goes to 12 permanently (in which case Henry Slade might have to be packed off to balance the back line) or Itoje takes the armband.
 

Grizzly

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
677
Visit site
The phenomenon that is Itoje aside, the Saracens contingent were well below par... IMHO that is due to lack of 'match sharpness'... Not sure/convinced that be returned through training sessions alone...

Miles on the clock? They have all played a lot of rugby, or missed a lot through serious injury, over the last four years. George wasn't THAT bad, and Daly is being asked to play in at best his third best position mind...

Big Billy is the worry. When we have two Curry's, Underhill, Wilson, Earl, Willis, Ludlam, Dombrandt and Sam Simmonds (hell, Zak Mercer has gone abroad because he can't even make a list of possibles!) it might be time to ask him to rediscover his form with Sarries.
 

Val

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
12,393
Location
Central Scotland
Visit site
Unbelievable that folk are calling for Owen Farrell to be dropped from the England team. England were terrible up front and the ball to the backs was often slow which gave the Scots loads of time to set up and defend. Conditions weren’t great either and Jones had a plan to put the Scottish back 3 under territorial pressure. Hardly the recipe for a flowing game.

He’s a guaranteed starter for the Lions tour.

I just don’t get it at all

He is most definitely not a guaranteed starter for the Lions, he's not the best 10 in England never mind GB&I. He should concentrate on being a 12. Ford is far better for England IMO.
 

Val

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
12,393
Location
Central Scotland
Visit site
Miles on the clock? They have all played a lot of rugby, or missed a lot through serious injury, over the last four years. George wasn't THAT bad, and Daly is being asked to play in at best his third best position mind...

Big Billy is the worry. When we have two Curry's, Underhill, Wilson, Earl, Willis, Ludlam, Dombrandt and Sam Simmonds (hell, Zak Mercer has gone abroad because he can't even make a list of possibles!) it might be time to ask him to rediscover his form with Sarries.

He fits the Jones mould, big and huge but other than that he doesn't do much. It's exactly why Jones won't give Simmonds a run, he's not big enough for him despite being a fantastic player.
 

Grizzly

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
677
Visit site
He is most definitely not a guaranteed starter for the Lions, he's not the best 10 in England never mind GB&I. He should concentrate on being a 12. Ford is far better for England IMO.

I think he's probably pretty close for the Lions, but I suspect it will be at 12. He fits the way Gatland wants to play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Val

Grizzly

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
677
Visit site
He fits the Jones mould, big and huge but other than that he doesn't do much. It's exactly why Jones won't give Simmonds a run, he's not big enough for him despite being a fantastic player.

Fully fit and in form, of course he would be in, but he is nowhere near and if we are honest, has not been for some time.

The argument for his inclusion is clear enough I guess - England's game is based on forward power and big hitters to create space for their playmakers. At present, we've gone from a squad featuring Manu, Ben Te'o, Joe Cocanasiga etc to one where we are perhaps one or two ball carriers light. So, Billy.

Is Simmons a better bet? He wouldn't be more than a bench player for me because he is another speed runner rather than a yard making tackle breaker. If we think Curry and Underhill are our 6,7 combo, then 8 would need to be Dombrandt or at a push Ben Earl. I do think it is underestimated how much playing in an Exeter back row with the likes of Don Armand, Sam Skinner, Dave Ewers, Joanne Vermeulen etc - big units all - makes a difference to his game!
 

HeftyHacker

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 14, 2020
Messages
1,565
Visit site
He will start for the Lions. Not sure which position though.

I'd agree with this. Not sure it'll be deserved but it will happen.

However, I've been of the opinion for a few years that Farrell just doesn't get the back line moving enough, he's too robotic and unable to adapt to play whats in front of him. He's fine behind a monster pack getting him clean, quick ball (sarries and england occasionally) and with big ball carriers getting him on the front foot, but I don't feel he can create something out of nothing like some of the other options for England and the lions.
 

Grizzly

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
677
Visit site
I'd agree with this. Not sure it'll be deserved but it will happen.

I've been of the opinion for a few years that Farrell just doesn't get the back line moving enough, he's too robotic and unable to adapt to play whats in front of him. He's fine behind a monster pack getting him clean, quick ball and with big ball carriers getting him on the front foot, but I don't feel he can create something out of nothing like some of the other options for England and the lions.

As a second playmaker and defensive coordinator at 12, I get it.

I think he struggles to be a sole playmaker. Most of his top level rugby has been with either Ford or Andy Goode alongside him.
 

Doon frae Troon

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
18,718
Location
S W Scotland
Visit site
Don't need to shut pubs to have the Calcutta Cup, we've had it for 3 out the last 4 6 nations
Yes, I should have said at Twickenham.
I shall never forget the last time that happened as I was in a packed Wiltshire clubhouse just having enjoyed a victory for team Scotland in the club's golf Home Internationals,
We did enjoy that day.
 

SwingsitlikeHogan

Major Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
32,366
Visit site
Yes, I should have said at Twickenham.
I shall never forget the last time that happened as I was in a packed Wiltshire clubhouse just having enjoyed a victory for team Scotland in the club's golf Home Internationals,
We did enjoy that day.
I was still living at home and watched the match with my mum (though she'd have been flitting between living room and kitchen)...my dad wasn't that bothered about sport and he'd most likely have been in the garage building furniture - so the win last weekend was for me a lovely little time-machine back to simpler days :)
 

Val

Ryder Cup Winner
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
12,393
Location
Central Scotland
Visit site
As a second playmaker and defensive coordinator at 12, I get it.

I think he struggles to be a sole playmaker. Most of his top level rugby has been with either Ford or Andy Goode alongside him.

I actually believe he's hugely over rated as a 10, I think England have at least 3 better options than him. He's a safe pair of hands when it's working up front but when not he's lost. There's a reason why on the 2017 Lions tour we lost with him at 10 on test 1 and won then drew with Sexton at 10
 

Grizzly

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
677
Visit site
I actually believe he's hugely over rated as a 10, I think England have at least 3 better options than him. He's a safe pair of hands when it's working up front but when not he's lost. There's a reason why on the 2017 Lions tour we lost with him at 10 on test 1 and won then drew with Sexton at 10


Hmmm... I suspect Sonny Bill's red card was the biggest factor, no?
 
Top