YandaB
Newbie
Comedy try, I'll take it.
Having been a massive critic of Borthwick's reign so far, I actually didn't think England were bad last night. Not that I thought they were great, but there was at least a sense of leadership on the field from Lawes and Ford, the defence was making consistently good decisions and crucially the penalty count was under control. Some of the handling was poor - but to be fair it was hot and sticky in the stadium and this was a problem for both side - but that apart it was at least an improvement. Look, we're ranked six in the world right now - that's both a fair assessment, and one that hides the gap between the top three/four sides and everyone else. We're not going to win it - but if we keep improving and maybe make a semi due to a tame draw, it will give them something to base the next four year cycle on.
And yes, Smith does look like an interesting option at full back. I'd just prefer them to keep Steward on and move him to the wing when Smith arrives.
Fair assessment.
Not making any excuses for England but I wonder if there are issues with the ball being used for this world cup as there appear to be handling issues across the board.
I think we will see Farrell at fly half next week and Chile would seem to be the ideal time to get him time on the pitch which is a pity as I think Ford controls a game better than anyone. Also would like to see Lawrence and Marchant in the centers and we must have a better wing option. Daly is starting to look his age and I have never been the biggest fan of May even when he was a Tiger.
Would also like to see the full Tigers second row get a run out, Martin and Chessum really do pay well together.
Interesting video analysis doing the rounds for the Wales/Fiji game.
Whilst it was not exactly Andre Watson refereeing the 2003 World Cup Final in his special Green and Gold glasses, a lot has been made of the lack of equity in that game and (appreciating that some of the penalties that the creator is arguing Wales committed are microscopic infringements) its not a performance the referee should look back on with any pride. It was mentioned in the Press that the deference to authority within Fijian culture has done them no favours.
I think your point about equity is a good one. Watching the Ireland/Tonga game at the weekend it was noticeable how the referee (think it was Wayne Barnes) kept referring to the Irish by their first names but to the Tongans by their numbers. He knows the Irish players cause he's reffing them 2 or 3 times a year and watching their games. He has no idea who half the Tongans are. It's just an unconscious bias that can only be avoided by more frequent games between tier 1 and 2 teams or top refs spending more time reffing secondary games.
Take the emerging nations games around the country. If England played Japan at St James Park I'm sure it would sell out and it would make the England team less London centric. You can say the same for Manchester, Leeds, SW, Midlands etc
The England women's football team do not have an exclusive deal with Wembley so they are coming to Sunderland this Friday to play Scotland. It's all possible, it comes down to finances. It always comes down to financesI would very much agree with that, in fact I am not convinced any national sports team should be only based in one stadium. Sadly, the RFU would never do it plus I am not sure how much the stadium costs are and also not sure who takes the money from the lucrative catering, bars etc.
The England women's football team do not have an exclusive deal with Wembley so they are coming to Sunderland this Friday to play Scotland. It's all possible, it comes down to finances. It always comes down to finances
So Antoine DuPont has a fractured cheekbone! Changes the landscape massively! Could be that they have lost their first choice 'brains trust' and I think that will be a massive issue for them
Love the RWC though.