It’s nice to see the troglodytes expose themselves on social media though, isn’t it?A little clue… their advertising campaign has cost Budweiser $400M![]()
It’s nice to see the troglodytes expose themselves on social media though, isn’t it?A little clue… their advertising campaign has cost Budweiser $400M![]()
And the truly wokeIt’s nice to see the troglodytes expose themselves on social media though, isn’t it?
Was it really the advertising campaign that cost them $400m? Or was it the ridiculous response by so-called "conservatives" that cost them?A little clue… their advertising campaign has cost Budweiser $400M![]()
Well done youIt’s nice to see the troglodytes expose themselves on social media though, isn’t it?
It is funny that the only way I become aware of these things is when the same few middle-aged men talk about it on a golf forum. It is a strange fascination that some of you have. Nobody else seems to care.
Was it really the advertising campaign that cost them $400m? Or was it the ridiculous response by so-called "conservatives" that cost them?
These are the same "conservatives" that believe that Trump really won and is a great businessman, bring God in to almost everything and want to ban books that don't fit their world view as being evil, pornographic or grooming children...
Those "conservatives", yeah? And you think a biological male identifying as a woman is what cost Budweiser? As Ace Ventura said, "Reeeaaaaaallllllllyyyyy!?!"...
That's irrelevant. The campaign was run. A certain demographic/politico grouped together, most who probably had no idea who Mulvaney is, and went with the herd.What a load of waffle… ask yourself the question, if Bud Light had not run the campaign would they have lost $400M?
It is funny that the only way I become aware of these things is when the same few middle-aged men talk about it on a golf forum. It is a strange fascination that some of you have. Nobody else seems to care.
It’s nice to see the troglodytes expose themselves on social media though, isn’t it?
But a jail sentence would have cost the taxpayer even more and what benefit would jailing him do for society?Bernie Ecclestone admits he committed a £400m fraud, and gets a suspended sentence. Talk about one law for the rich, and another one for the rest of us.
It sends a message to the next rich person looking to commit the same fraud. Now, it's a free hit for them, no real deterrent.what benefit would jailing him do for society?
£650m fine hardly a free hitIt sends a message to the next rich person looking to commit the same fraud. Now, it's a free hit for them, no real deterrent.
Exactly.It sends a message to the next rich person looking to commit the same fraud. Now, it's a free hit for them, no real deterrent.
Except its not a £650m fine. It's a settlement of what he should have paid over 18 years when he was avoiding tax, plus interest and civil penalties.£650m fine hardly a free hit![]()