You were 100% right in the way you handled it. Always gotta be sure before pulling someone up about it.
Tell me your not serious.
Ok the guy got caught, but it brings on the question of what is the proper way to mark the ball,
When I first started playing, I had the marker actually touching the bottom of the ball,
This however caused issues when removing the marker as sometimes I would catch the ball with my fingers as I removed the marker.
So now I put the leading edge of the marker directly underneath the edge of the ball, as you look down on it. so there is a gap of about 1 cm between the marker and the base of the ball.
This allows me to move the marker without touching the ball
Is this what everyone else does?
Must be an East Lothian phenomenon, they must get taught it at primary school
I am... whilst I agree the rules need to be upheld this is something that wouldn't overly bother me but do appreciate it would with others, FWIW I don't mark my balls like said player
When I read this I grabbed a couple of penny coins and a ball, slid 1 penny right up to the ball and the other coin directly behind it... when I removed the penny against the ball the gap really didn't look that bad and like I read previously could it have been him looking for a slightly better surface to place his ball on uneven, winter greens?
Sorry but I just wouldn't have created an awkward situation over this... I do agree with others stating you should have questioned it earlier in the round when you saw it though instead of waiting till exchanging cards at the end.
If this doesnt matter to anyone then you should not be playing golf IMO
View attachment 5446 View attachment 5447
If this doesnt matter to anyone then you should not be playing golf IMO
View attachment 5446 View attachment 5447
I still don't get this. If you had suspicions it would have been easy enough to watch him mark and replace his ball much earlier in the round. Don't understand why you left it till the 18th before saying anything.
A thought occurred to me while looking at that photo above. Perhaps when he marks his ball he leans forward, slides the coin under the ball and picks the ball up. You dont replace the ball in the same manner, so perhaps he studies the line from behind, moves forward, lining the line of the ball up with the line he wants and places it in front of the marker. moves the ball to make sure the line is correct and then lifts the coin. Hes constantly behind the ball in this process and from slightly behind the replaced ball looks like its been placed correctly. Only if you went to the side or looked right over it would you possibly see a small gap.
So, rather than cheating, perhaps this is a plausible explanation of what happened? It could also explain why he didnt have an answer and was confused why someone accused him of cheating.
Just a thought and only one possible explanation. Is it beyond the possibility of reasonable doubt that this could be the case?
Just to be clear though, as the written word can be taken the wrong way, I am not claiming what you did was wrong or over the top, I am just looking at it from another possible angle to offer debate (like a forum should ;-) )
If a player is willing to mark his ball in such a manner, knowing it is a breach of the rules, what else might they do out there on the course.
I am... whilst I agree the rules need to be upheld this is something that wouldn't overly bother me but do appreciate it would with others, FWIW I don't mark my balls like said player
When I read this I grabbed a couple of penny coins and a ball, slid 1 penny right up to the ball and the other coin directly behind it... when I removed the penny against the ball the gap really didn't look that bad and like I read previously could it have been him looking for a slightly better surface to place his ball on uneven, winter greens?
Sorry but I just wouldn't have created an awkward situation over this... I do agree with others stating you should have questioned it earlier in the round when you saw it though instead of waiting till exchanging cards at the end.
I've taken the liberty of highlighting some interesting features in what you say. Firstly, how do you reconcile the belief that the rules have to be upheld while not being bothered by a breach of the rules? Then, when you suggest he might have been looking for a better lie for his ball, it sounds as if that is being dismissed as unimportant? (Sorry if that is a misreading.) And lastly, would you not agree that it isn't the person calling a breach of the rules that is creating an awkward situation, but the player who is in breach of them in the first place? It is certainly awkward for the player pointing out the breach, but it isn't of his making.