Oddsocks
Ryder Cup Winner
Resigning from Liv or just wasn’t resigned? Big difference in the two and you’d never get the truth from Reed either way.
So according to LIV they couldn’t agree terms, Greedy Reedy yet again!
Resigning from Liv or just wasn’t resigned? Big difference in the two and you’d never get the truth from Reed either way.
Any chance Rahm leaves yet or is he signed on for the year at Liv?
How do you know the terms were about money?So according to LIV they couldn’t agree terms, Greedy Reedy yet again!
Errrr.... NoHow do you know the terms were about money?
Maybe he was asking to not have to play every Liv event. You know be a free agent?
Errr….. how do you know?Errrr.... No
How do you know the terms were about money?
Maybe he was asking to not have to play every Liv event. You know be a free agent?
Reality check ii
Reed makes no difference in my view. Liv still has only two players I'd bother about going to see live. (BdC and Rahm) The rest? Disappeared from consciousness, or never were, or well past sell by date. (Personal view)
So, I'm thinking what might make it generate interest. (If you see past the usual objections)
The first thought I had was if several of the "McKibbin generation" develop sufficiently to win Majors and become big starts regardless of how world rankings are calculated.
Could that happen? Jury's still out.
Edit: see what I mean? I forgot about Hatton!![]()
You also forgot about Dustin Johnson - no bother almost everybody seems to have.
Important bit highlighted in boldYou also forgot about Dustin Johnson - no bother almost everybody seems to have.
Anyway last time I posted a link to the sports section of the Guardian I was told it counts as politics but here's a pretty good summary of the state of it.
Guardian article
If someone is injured or sick they'd be a stand in. Can see that happening to buy some time.With literally 6 days till the 1st event what the hell are the 4 Aces going to do ?
This brand did a good job of limiting the damage changing the narrative to the 3 Aces but obviously shows they really didnt expect Reed to leave..
It was, yeah, they said something about major winners across the last x number of years didn't they? But they didn't have to say that at all, they could've made the criteria anything they wanted. Maybe add in anyone who's maintained a top 50 world ranking for example. I'd have thought Hatton was a very desirable asset to try and win back.I think you're right, but maybe that's based on Major wins?
Hatton's also a better potential source of fines?![]()